Scan barcode
branhowe's review against another edition
3.0
This is the first book I bought from Phillip K. Dick. I've known his name from Blade Runner so I was expecting to read more Sci-fi in here instead of something more inclined towards a theological search.
I've got to admit that his style has great pacing and I was unable to leave the book alone, even when I was dealing with a completely deranged character. In spite of the complexity of the character's mental state, you understand well enough where you are, where they are and what impulses their behaviour.
However, I did feel a bit disappointed since this was not the ride I was hoping for... Still, I would highly recommend it. If all, the dead cat joke will keep your wits together lol
I've got to admit that his style has great pacing and I was unable to leave the book alone, even when I was dealing with a completely deranged character. In spite of the complexity of the character's mental state, you understand well enough where you are, where they are and what impulses their behaviour.
However, I did feel a bit disappointed since this was not the ride I was hoping for... Still, I would highly recommend it. If all, the dead cat joke will keep your wits together lol
anti_formalist12's review against another edition
5.0
The revelatory moments come so fast you'll probably end up forgetting most of them. I did, at least.
jimmypat's review against another edition
4.0
Let me say from the outset that my rating in no way reflects that I accept Dick's philosophical/theological ramblings: they are indeed complete nonsense. However, this book was highly entertaining, with the madness of Horselover Fat/Philip Dick taking center stage. The questions raised about Dick's sanity in real life versus the sanity of his avatar in the book are really intriguing. In the end, I think he was a gifted writer who was a bit loony.
zachari's review against another edition
5.0
this was my first PKD book I've read--definitely going back for more. some of the best use of metatextualism I've encountered, Fat is a compelling, relatable, and thoughtful working of a mystic-psychotic, a trope which is very easy to fuck up. the other characters--especially Philip, Kevin, and the mental health workers--were developed richly and beautifully
will say i found the last quarter or so of the book--basically from when they meet Mother Goose onwards--to be kind of a letdown, at least until Fat makes a reappearance.
i am excited to continue the series and to read PKD's Exegesis someday!
will say i found the last quarter or so of the book--basically from when they meet Mother Goose onwards--to be kind of a letdown, at least until Fat makes a reappearance.
i am excited to continue the series and to read PKD's Exegesis someday!
jvendrell's review against another edition
5.0
Estos últimos días me he puesto a releer Valis, la antepenúltima novela que escribió Philip K. Dick antes de morir. Junto con las dos siguientes, que son La invasión divina y La transmigración de Timothy Archer, forma una trilogía de temática religiosa y filosófica.
Valis es un rayo rosa proveniente del espacio que golpeó a Philip K. Dick en 1974 y le proporcionó información condensada sobre su propia vida y la de sus seres queridos (eso creía él). Gracias a la información que le fue transmitida, Dick pudo salvar la vida de su hijo Christopher, que padecía una grave enfermedad todavía sin diagnosticar. El libro es casi en su totalidad una autobiografía de Dick, aunque hay partes difíciles de crees.
Valis es el acrónimo de Vast Active Living Intelligence System.
Sigo pensando que el libro es una de las mejores novelas de Philip K. Dick y una de las mejores novelas que se han escrito.
Una de las cuestiones que Dick trata de resolver en Valis es por qué vivimos en un universo tan cruel, por qué suceden cosas horribles a las personas y cosas que amamos. ¿Existe Dios? ¿Es bondadoso, es malvado o es irracional? Las propias experiencias de Dick, la Biblia y otras escrituras de distintas religiones se utilizan como fundamento para intentar dar respuesta a estas preguntas, para encontrar una explicación satisfactoria a la realidad. Así las cosas, podríamos definir Valis como la búsqueda de la verdad –del significado de la vida– que emprende Dick durante los últimos años de su vida.
Para poder juzgar los acontecimientos des de un punto de vista objetivo, Dick decide desdoblar su personalidad, encarnando en Valis a dos personajes a la vez. Por un lado tenemos a Amacaballo Fat, el protagonista de la novela, que tiene un encuentro con Dios (una teofanía, como él mismo define) y que trata de buscar respuestas. Y Philip, el escritor de ciencia ficción, el narrador de toda la historia, que juzga el comportamiento y los sentimientos de Fat. Digamos que Philip representa su sentido más introspectivo, mientras que Fat representa sus dudas y temores sobre la vida y la realidad.
Si Dick llega a alguna conclusión al final de la novela y si consigue vencer a la irracionalidad y a la locura que le llevó a intentar suicidarse dos veces es algo que debe descubrirse por uno mismo.
Recomiendo encarecidamente la lectura del libro, sobra decirlo.
Valis es un rayo rosa proveniente del espacio que golpeó a Philip K. Dick en 1974 y le proporcionó información condensada sobre su propia vida y la de sus seres queridos (eso creía él). Gracias a la información que le fue transmitida, Dick pudo salvar la vida de su hijo Christopher, que padecía una grave enfermedad todavía sin diagnosticar. El libro es casi en su totalidad una autobiografía de Dick, aunque hay partes difíciles de crees.
Valis es el acrónimo de Vast Active Living Intelligence System.
Sigo pensando que el libro es una de las mejores novelas de Philip K. Dick y una de las mejores novelas que se han escrito.
Una de las cuestiones que Dick trata de resolver en Valis es por qué vivimos en un universo tan cruel, por qué suceden cosas horribles a las personas y cosas que amamos. ¿Existe Dios? ¿Es bondadoso, es malvado o es irracional? Las propias experiencias de Dick, la Biblia y otras escrituras de distintas religiones se utilizan como fundamento para intentar dar respuesta a estas preguntas, para encontrar una explicación satisfactoria a la realidad. Así las cosas, podríamos definir Valis como la búsqueda de la verdad –del significado de la vida– que emprende Dick durante los últimos años de su vida.
Para poder juzgar los acontecimientos des de un punto de vista objetivo, Dick decide desdoblar su personalidad, encarnando en Valis a dos personajes a la vez. Por un lado tenemos a Amacaballo Fat, el protagonista de la novela, que tiene un encuentro con Dios (una teofanía, como él mismo define) y que trata de buscar respuestas. Y Philip, el escritor de ciencia ficción, el narrador de toda la historia, que juzga el comportamiento y los sentimientos de Fat. Digamos que Philip representa su sentido más introspectivo, mientras que Fat representa sus dudas y temores sobre la vida y la realidad.
Si Dick llega a alguna conclusión al final de la novela y si consigue vencer a la irracionalidad y a la locura que le llevó a intentar suicidarse dos veces es algo que debe descubrirse por uno mismo.
Recomiendo encarecidamente la lectura del libro, sobra decirlo.
zwwwp's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
5.0
tombomp's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
I was recommended this after having mixed feelings about Ubik. I'm not sure I was more into it, but it's definitely more *interesting*, which is good. The pulp storyline there is completely dropped - this is a (semi?)-autobiographical voyage through him trying to understand the universe and the meaning of reality. A lot of stuff happens but it's unclear if any of it is even close to what's "real". It feels much more honest about this than the other novels he's written where it often feels less clever and more like a cheap twist. Here it feels like there's an admission thinking about this stuff is basically impossible, even with revelations - the world may be illusion of some kind but it still clearly *is* for us at the moment.
The big thing that probably put me off from the start is that 3 women characters are introduced in the first 1/3 or so, and they're all basically evil. The woman right at the start, looking for a way to kill herself? She's not just hit rock bottom, she's deeply evil and trying to bring everyone else down with her. The MC's wife? She only sought a divorce because she believed it would kill the MC. The woman waiting, knowing she'll soon die from a return of cancer which almost wiped her out first time? She hates everyone who's nice to her because she wants to be miserable and wanted the cancer to come back. It's really really noticeable. It's sort of understandable in terms of the book's "philosophy" to have a character like that. Having 3 and they're all women? Eesh. Like, this is both a narrative issue and clearly an issue he had IRL, that he did not like women, despite marrying 5 times. It's uncomfortable as hell! Especially when it's used to teach the "lesson" that the MC/Dick "needs to stop helping people" because he loves doing it and he's too kind lmao. It's lesser, but there's also a weird lack of sympathy for drug users, especially given he was one for a long time AFAIK (even in narrative!)
I think that genuinely made me feel a lot less inclined to try to get to grips with the weird, shifting, complex account of gnosis here. It is kind of fascinating. What parts are played by three eyed aliens, an eternal satellite, a reincarnation of Jesus/the Buddha/Zoroaster, immortal Christians from Jesus's time, a thought transmission device from the Soviets? Even to the end we don't really know. The likelihood of each constantly shifts. There's a sort of logic and cohesion to it, even if the shifts follow a logic that's not rational exactly (although of course what's rational in an irrational world? If a delusional person tries to rationalise their delusions that's treated as proof they're irrational). It's hard to believe that 3 people would have their entire worldview shifted as the result of watching a strange sci-fi film, but there is some logic when they read into it symbols they'd already seen elsewhere. There's a strange mix of the banal and the epiphany. The divine can be discovered in clay pots and drive in B-movies. Maybe ultimately the search is more important than the destination, the openness to the out of the ordinary, accepting it and letting it drive you even if it appears strange and delusional to others. Maybe you need to be more grounded, even if you always remain waiting for something more. The book doesn't feel certain at the end. It goes through a lot of stuff that's strange but ultimately accepts that right now we don't know. But he's certain there's something more, at least.
Ultimately a book with a lot of interesting stuff, even if the philosophy is a bit difficult to sit through sometimes. Just found things like the treatment of women enough to throw me off.
The big thing that probably put me off from the start is that 3 women characters are introduced in the first 1/3 or so, and they're all basically evil. The woman right at the start, looking for a way to kill herself? She's not just hit rock bottom, she's deeply evil and trying to bring everyone else down with her. The MC's wife? She only sought a divorce because she believed it would kill the MC. The woman waiting, knowing she'll soon die from a return of cancer which almost wiped her out first time? She hates everyone who's nice to her because she wants to be miserable and wanted the cancer to come back. It's really really noticeable. It's sort of understandable in terms of the book's "philosophy" to have a character like that. Having 3 and they're all women? Eesh. Like, this is both a narrative issue and clearly an issue he had IRL, that he did not like women, despite marrying 5 times. It's uncomfortable as hell! Especially when it's used to teach the "lesson" that the MC/Dick "needs to stop helping people" because he loves doing it and he's too kind lmao. It's lesser, but there's also a weird lack of sympathy for drug users, especially given he was one for a long time AFAIK (even in narrative!)
I think that genuinely made me feel a lot less inclined to try to get to grips with the weird, shifting, complex account of gnosis here. It is kind of fascinating. What parts are played by three eyed aliens, an eternal satellite, a reincarnation of Jesus/the Buddha/Zoroaster, immortal Christians from Jesus's time, a thought transmission device from the Soviets? Even to the end we don't really know. The likelihood of each constantly shifts. There's a sort of logic and cohesion to it, even if the shifts follow a logic that's not rational exactly (although of course what's rational in an irrational world? If a delusional person tries to rationalise their delusions that's treated as proof they're irrational). It's hard to believe that 3 people would have their entire worldview shifted as the result of watching a strange sci-fi film, but there is some logic when they read into it symbols they'd already seen elsewhere. There's a strange mix of the banal and the epiphany. The divine can be discovered in clay pots and drive in B-movies. Maybe ultimately the search is more important than the destination, the openness to the out of the ordinary, accepting it and letting it drive you even if it appears strange and delusional to others. Maybe you need to be more grounded, even if you always remain waiting for something more. The book doesn't feel certain at the end. It goes through a lot of stuff that's strange but ultimately accepts that right now we don't know. But he's certain there's something more, at least.
Ultimately a book with a lot of interesting stuff, even if the philosophy is a bit difficult to sit through sometimes. Just found things like the treatment of women enough to throw me off.
nerdofdoom's review against another edition
5.0
Phillip K. Dick can not be compared to any other writer. Read this book, but strap yourself in, it's a ride. I don't even know what more to say about it.
4littlebtye's review against another edition
dark
emotional
funny
mysterious
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? N/A
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
ttl's review against another edition
challenging
mysterious
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0