lunabean's reviews
216 reviews

My Brilliant Friend by Elena Ferrante

Go to review page

adventurous challenging reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

Everything I Know About Love by Dolly Alderton

Go to review page

emotional funny hopeful inspiring reflective medium-paced

5.0

5 starsšŸ˜­ I hesitated reading this bc Iā€™d felt that these books tend to talk of the same banal things: how love doesnā€™t make you whole, how friendships are equally important etc, through stories where the writer would ironicallyā€¦ obsess over romantic love & then learn from it all in the end. Iā€™d expected myself to feel bitter reading this, wondering what it could possibly offer me that I donā€™t already know. HOWEVR

Yes all the cliches are there, but it didnā€™t feel trite or full of platitudes. Alderton made the book feel like a friend, a cozy warm thing, recounting her experiences in early adulthood: MSN, her first dates, her changing ideas of love, being mostly inebriated during uni, her first heartbreak, flat-sharing in london, her eating habits, sharing wisdom sheā€™s learnt from these experiences. I found her uni stories particularly relatable, times when she felt like she owned London, her youth and her freedom. I felt exactly like this when I lived there, like I had to be having the most fun, every time, all the time.

With Alderton being 30 & me being in my mid-20s most of the things sheā€™s written I relate to painfully. For eg I love how like Alderton in her twenties, I am also obsessive, painfully nostalgic, and envision love to be endlessly passionate and all-consuming. Alderton writes about the difference between intimacy and intensity through a relationship with a man she deeply connected with in a shockingly short amount of time that eventually ended as abruptly as it began.

She talks of the scariness of this transitionary time from your early adulthood to actual adulthood, how scary it is to no longer be the generation that decides what is relevant, to wonder what the point of it all is - ā€œIs this it? TCR & ordering shit off Amazon?ā€

While the book shares insight into what it feels like to be a coming-of-age woman, we should note that Alderton is a straight white woman living in London, whilst poc & lgbt+ women have to bear the burden of all the extra struggles that come w the intersectionality of our race and sexuality. Apart from that, it has a lot of wisdom, spirit & honesty, full 5 starsšŸ˜­šŸ«¶šŸ¼ā¤ļøā€šŸ©¹
Elektra by Jennifer Saint

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

Cleopatra and Frankenstein by Coco Mellors

Go to review page

dark emotional sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Lessons in Chemistry by Bonnie Garmus

Go to review page

funny hopeful inspiring slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

2.75

So many rave reviews and on bestselling bookshelves everywhere I thought it was going to be spectacular and literary, spewing wisdom, but really it felt like a childā€™s read.

The great part about it is the characters and the way Garmus tells the story. The characters are very loveable, at times funny. I especially loved Six-Thirty (the dog)ā€˜s internal monologues. The writing has no metaphors, no subtlety, just straightforward, direct prose that allows you to devour the book in a couple sittings. I usually have to reread sentences when I read, but hardly did it at all for this one. Most of the prose was back and forth conversation so it feels like reading a movie script. Itā€™s like reading at an easy level, thereā€™s nothing in it really that requires critical thinking, so this oneā€™s for you if you want to relax your brain.

The plot thoughā€¦ cliche after cliche. Itā€™s the 1950s and the protagonist, Elizabeth Zott, is a chemist who struggles to be taken seriously by anyone because people believed women belonged at home. Most of what Zott stands for (writerā€™s moral voice) is awesome - feminism, the importance of choice and the role of the housewife, education and learning etc, but Garmus conveyed these in a way that came off so so SO cheesy. I get that itā€™s the 1950s but the good guys and the bad guys were so black and white that it felt like I was reading a childrenā€™s book.

And THEN thereā€™s the trauma dumpingā€¦ topics of rape, sexual harassment, suicide, abuse, littered in between the clichesšŸ„“šŸ„“

I wanted to love this book. I do like the story, itā€™s fun and cute, but the writing just didnā€™t hit the mark for meā€¦ I can see older women enjoying this one though. Maybe Iā€™m just not the target audiencešŸ¤·šŸ»ā€ā™€ļø
True Biz by Sara Nović

Go to review page

informative inspiring reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.75

In the Dream House by Carmen Maria Machado

Go to review page

challenging dark informative slow-paced

3.75

My first read of the year was a non-fiction one, who is shešŸ«£ A memoir about domestic abuse in a queer relationship, examining the cultural representations of non-physical abuse and its reality. In addition to the topic of abuse, Machado explores the intersectionality between the queer community and its history of abuse, the lack of accurate archives and accounts (ā€œarchival silenceā€) due to homophobia and the ability to record history lying in the hands of the powerful/oppressor. Even though it may be harmful to ā€œrecord/archiveā€ the negative parts of humanity that exist also in queer relationships, Machado claims it is essential, to show that there is a shared humanity. One page really stood out to me ā€œFirst, forget I am a lesbian. And second, never forget I am a lesbian.ā€ It is to say that our relationships are not unlike your heterosexual relationships, with its ugliness and sorrowsā€¦ but ours are also different because we have struggles you never have to face.

Machado also unpacks stereotypes on queer/lesbian relationships and their impact - for example how people view them as utopian, harmless, and thus unlikely to be abusive; how others impose gender roles ā€œwho is the man in the relationship?ā€ and assume the more masculine person to fit the mold of ā€œabuserā€ and more feminine person the ā€œvictimā€. 

Each chapter is short and terse, though not lacking in intensity, with every page leaving the reader with things to mull over and reflect upon. A very powerful read, challenged me from start to finish. I really recommend this to all!!

Expand filter menu Content Warnings
Now Is Not the Time to Panic by Kevin Wilson

Go to review page

emotional reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

4.0

Ariadne by Jennifer Saint

Go to review page

adventurous emotional reflective sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

The Marriage Portrait by Maggie O'Farrell

Go to review page

adventurous emotional mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0