Scan barcode
artemistics's review against another edition
dark
slow-paced
2.5
joan lindsay's literary debut after a long career in the arts presents the mystery of three girls from a private and prestigious boarding school going missing while picnicking at hanging rock, australia in the year 1900, cheekily mentioning in a foreword that the events may or may not be fictional. we spend very little time with the girls (only about three chapters; a couple of pages) before they disappear into the wilderness of the dangerous hanging rock, and in the meantime we're slowly introduced to the dynamics of appleyard college (the boarding school), from its strict headmistress to the governesses and students, all very proper victorian ladies. the atmosphere built here is lovely like these beautiful girls who drink lemonade and eat valentine's day cake, and the tranquility and images of the lacey summer dresses with the sweetness of their lunch and the sleepy afternoon after a good meal, spent dozing under the shade and amongst nature, mixes wonderfully with the latent danger we know is ahead for the three star senior boarders: irma, marion, and the beloved by all miranda, who might as well be an angel. there's clocks that stop at 12 p.m. on the dot, and the need to be barefoot, and governesses without skirts and a strange, pink cloud taking over the sky, and then—the girls are gone, and we have a mystery. (as a huge aside, i read these while listening to this lovely playlist, and i cannot recommend it enough. so dreamy and weird, and the only thing keeping me going from going cross-eyed with some chapters, lol.) what's perhaps the most disappointing thing is how fast the picnic is done with, and how much more of the book we have left where we don't deal with the facts of the mystery almost at all, instead focusing on the aftermath for the characters surrounding the area of the hanging rock and the downfall of the college's reputation after such a tragedy.
i don't usually have a problem with uncertainty and open-endedness. i don't particularly mind them, when done right. lindsay's book became such a hit because it captivated readers with its unsolved mystery for decades, prompting invesitgations to find out if there were any facts in the story, and half the fun to those people was going back and thinking about the many, unlimited possibilities that could have occurred to make three girls disappear off the face of the earth. hanging rock has actually become actual part of australian folklore, which is amazing. i love being able to have such a connection to a good mystery in a book to the point that it prompts me to theorize on my own after the fact, to tie the strings together myself, and i wish that could've happened to me with hanging rock, too. but i found the rest of this book so boring, sadly; the latter half was very difficult to get through, and i found myself constantly irritated by the lack of any further details about the mystery that would have prompted me to think more about it, to engage with it more passionately? instead we're stuck with the hateful headmistress and the normal comings and goings of the rest of the characters, 70% of the time completely divorced from the mystery itself.
in the foreword that i circled back to after finishing the novel, it's explained that there was a missing final chapter that lidnsay's editors recommended she take out of the book before publication, where she wrote down the explanation of what happened in hanging rock, and was later posthumously published by her editor. i actually found the contents of said chapter amazing, and incredibly interesting. entirely my shit, as a matter of fact. i would have loved to have more weird happenings that vaguely hinted at that explanation, to have the uncanny sprinkled more and more throughout the novel. i also felt missing a stronger feel to who the missing girls were, to be honest. miranda in particular is ridiculously talked up by absolutely every character that appears, and yet half the time i'm like, who the hell is this person, you know? instead, the sense of intrigue kills itself at around the middle point of the story, and you're stuck with people that you don't care that much about.
i can understand why this has stuck with audiences so heavily for so many years, but i was, unfortunately, very disappointed by my own expectations of a more gothic-esque existential horror. it's a 2.5 for me. on the bright side, the book has put me in a mood to rewatch twin peaks, and i remain optimistic about checking out peter weir's 70s film adaptation, so at least that's something, i guess.
i don't usually have a problem with uncertainty and open-endedness. i don't particularly mind them, when done right. lindsay's book became such a hit because it captivated readers with its unsolved mystery for decades, prompting invesitgations to find out if there were any facts in the story, and half the fun to those people was going back and thinking about the many, unlimited possibilities that could have occurred to make three girls disappear off the face of the earth. hanging rock has actually become actual part of australian folklore, which is amazing. i love being able to have such a connection to a good mystery in a book to the point that it prompts me to theorize on my own after the fact, to tie the strings together myself, and i wish that could've happened to me with hanging rock, too. but i found the rest of this book so boring, sadly; the latter half was very difficult to get through, and i found myself constantly irritated by the lack of any further details about the mystery that would have prompted me to think more about it, to engage with it more passionately? instead we're stuck with the hateful headmistress and the normal comings and goings of the rest of the characters, 70% of the time completely divorced from the mystery itself.
in the foreword that i circled back to after finishing the novel, it's explained that there was a missing final chapter that lidnsay's editors recommended she take out of the book before publication, where she wrote down the explanation of what happened in hanging rock, and was later posthumously published by her editor. i actually found the contents of said chapter amazing, and incredibly interesting. entirely my shit, as a matter of fact. i would have loved to have more weird happenings that vaguely hinted at that explanation, to have the uncanny sprinkled more and more throughout the novel. i also felt missing a stronger feel to who the missing girls were, to be honest. miranda in particular is ridiculously talked up by absolutely every character that appears, and yet half the time i'm like, who the hell is this person, you know? instead, the sense of intrigue kills itself at around the middle point of the story, and you're stuck with people that you don't care that much about.
i can understand why this has stuck with audiences so heavily for so many years, but i was, unfortunately, very disappointed by my own expectations of a more gothic-esque existential horror. it's a 2.5 for me. on the bright side, the book has put me in a mood to rewatch twin peaks, and i remain optimistic about checking out peter weir's 70s film adaptation, so at least that's something, i guess.
Graphic: Suicide
Moderate: Alcoholism
Minor: Sexual assault
ratesjul's review against another edition
3.0
I think I first read this book (or, possibly more to the point, started reading this book) when I was still in high school. I don't remember finishing it, and perhaps I didn't. At any rate, I'm glad to have picked it up again, and I found I saw more in it this time than before. The hardest part of the ending, to me, was what happened to Sara Waybourne. What did the headmistress do, and why did she take that step - and why didn't the letter from her mistress go to her, at the end of it all - it would have solved so much.
nicktraynor's review against another edition
4.0
I would classify this novel as Australian Gothic horror as there is a sense of malevolence and the macabre permeating the circumstances surrounding the disappearance of three girls and their governess, as well as the subsequent events in the lives of those associated with them. Joan Lindsay doesn’t baulk at the fact that she provides no explanation for how or why they went missing and this adds to the feeling of malice that seeps from the looming presence of the Hanging Rock throughout the book.
It’s not overreaching to suggest that there is a theme of sexuality running through the text. From the Rock’s features of boulders and peaks, caves and monoliths, to the girls dressed in virginal white at the time of their disappearance, and the setting of the story in the Victorian era of 1900, repressed sexuality and a curiosity of the taboo are readily apparent.
It is also a thoroughly Australian novel, with the European settler distrust, caution and fear of a landscape and an environment which can enact deadly force on its inhabitants. The mystery and symbolism of the story contained all the ingredients necessary to create a legacy of an enduring mythology.
It’s not overreaching to suggest that there is a theme of sexuality running through the text. From the Rock’s features of boulders and peaks, caves and monoliths, to the girls dressed in virginal white at the time of their disappearance, and the setting of the story in the Victorian era of 1900, repressed sexuality and a curiosity of the taboo are readily apparent.
It is also a thoroughly Australian novel, with the European settler distrust, caution and fear of a landscape and an environment which can enact deadly force on its inhabitants. The mystery and symbolism of the story contained all the ingredients necessary to create a legacy of an enduring mythology.
contemporarymeepsie's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Picnic at Hanging Rock recounts the Appleyard College Mystery in which three schoolgirls and one governess go missing on the Hanging Rock in Australia.
I found this book to be relatively compelling in its mystery although it is never solved so if that is what you are looking for then this is not the book for you. The characters were developed to a point (as much as classical literature is) and I found the way Madam Appleyard thought quite humorous although I don't think you are supposed to. I'm not usually a fan of classic literature and this had similar issues to what I normally find such as a slow plodding pace, unrelated information and characters that are annoying. But the mystery was enough to keep me reading and although I knew it remained unresolved, I did have fun reading to the end. If classics are your thing then I would recommend but I won't read it again.
I found this book to be relatively compelling in its mystery although it is never solved so if that is what you are looking for then this is not the book for you. The characters were developed to a point (as much as classical literature is) and I found the way Madam Appleyard thought quite humorous although I don't think you are supposed to. I'm not usually a fan of classic literature and this had similar issues to what I normally find such as a slow plodding pace, unrelated information and characters that are annoying. But the mystery was enough to keep me reading and although I knew it remained unresolved, I did have fun reading to the end. If classics are your thing then I would recommend but I won't read it again.
Moderate: Bullying, Child death, Suicide, and Murder
Minor: Alcoholism, Vomit, Grief, and Fire/Fire injury
redpoll's review against another edition
5.0
A strange, evocative, meandering mystery with an eerie magical atmosphere, this feels like it would have felt old fashioned and off putting even in the sixties when it was written. I suspect a lot of people reading will have felt frustrated by the lack of answers, but I found it added to the gutsquirming weirdness of the thing and really really liked it.
kaylareadsthings's review against another edition
dark
mysterious
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0