I really love how Philip K. Dick used repetitive imagery, narrative fragmentation, and perspective shifts to effectively depict time as a living, evolving force subject to both internal psychological processes and external societal decay.
Dick used repetition as a central device to evoke the fluid, non-linear nature of time. Recurring phrases, motifs, and images—such as time slips and decaying landscapes—mirror the cyclical and mutating quality of temporal experience. This repetition not only reinforces the thematic undercurrent of time’s instability but also unsettles the reader, inviting multiple interpretations of events.
Additionally, Dick employed a fragmented narrative structure and shifting perspectives. The disjointed chronology, interweaving flash-forwards, flashbacks, and subjective time perceptions (notably through Manfred Steiner’s unique view), creates layers of temporal reality. This multiplicity of viewpoints and the deliberate narrative disjunction serve to embody the notion that time is mutable and multifaceted—a dynamic entity that resists a singular, linear interpretation.
Aside from Peter Watts’s depiction of “vampires,” Octavia Butler’s portrayal of the Ina as mutual symbionts with humans not only allows readers to suspend their disbelief, but also question what it means to be free.
The book reads like a breezy conversation with your “cool” uncle recalling his rock-and-roll stories. Like other reviewers, I would have liked more nerdy explanations of sound and technique.