Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
my god, WTNV just doesn't miss. I really enjoyed getting to see more of the characters from the first novel and the podcast, and the newly introduced characters are just wonderful and lovable. my only criticism, which may be very subjective, is that as someone who did not grow up within a religion, sometimes the satirical nature of the religious elements felt... overdone? too on-the-nose? but I have no experience in that area and maybe it really is like that, I don't know. either way, what a great book.
just delightful — vulnerable, honest, informative, and funny. a difficult balance to strike in journalistic nonfiction, but Hurts So Good does it very well.
I'm mad because I absolutely adored The Borrower and therefore had really high hopes for this book, but it's just so slow and unsatisfying. I couldn't really get behind any of the characters, which is fine (no one said a protagonist has to be a good person), but none of them managed to be bad people in a way that made me want to read about them or care what happened to them despite it. The superatural element was the only truly interesting thing about this book and it was essentially nonexistent, just a topic of conversation to give the characters a connnection. lots of egregious racism that seemed to seve no purpose whatsoever. I have no idea how i was meant to be feeling at the end of the book or what exactly it was trying to tell me.
honestly, I think I partially stuck with this one because I loved reading about early-90s gay culture and was kind of enthralled by it—the writing is not fantastic (not horrible, either) and the plot dragged on occasion, but the setting and "set dressing" more than made up for that to me. this could be, objectively speaking, much better than it is, but I'll take the parts I liked and leave the rest.
I was expecting philosophical quandaries in the vein of the trolley problem, but this is a book about rhetorical fallacies. I'm willing to forgive the misleading, however, because I found it very incisive, easy to understand, and thought-provoking. I do think it's dated, though, and I can't help but wonder what Baggini's thoughts would be on the rhetoric used by today's journalists and politicians-- the same fallacies are in effect, but I think personal bias makes it harder to spot them. Overall, misleading marketing for this book but a good read for anyone wanting to improve their critical thinking skills. If I were teaching a media literacy class I would definitely incorporate passages from this book.