Scan barcode
kyarabereading's reviews
62 reviews
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
1.0
I reread this series purely for the nostalgia, and I did not enjoy most of it. Yes, at times the characters were loveable and the storylines were interesting. But the series is riddled with bad writing, odd pacing, plot holes, repetitive storylines, etc. It's really not worth reading.
Graphic: Addiction, Alcoholism, Bullying, Cursing, Death, Domestic abuse, Drug abuse, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Infertility, Infidelity, Mental illness, Misogyny, Sexism, Sexual assault, Sexual content, Sexual violence, Toxic relationship, Violence, Blood, Grief, Death of parent, Fire/Fire injury, Gaslighting, Toxic friendship, Abandonment, Alcohol, Sexual harassment, and Injury/Injury detail
Moderate: Vomit and Car accident
Minor: Pregnancy
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
3.75
Some other things I enjoyed while reading were the character work and the use of magical realism. As for the character work, the characters are loveable, and it was great getting to know them and the bond they all share. As for the magical realism, I found the premise of the book (and the rules that came along with it) very interesting. The rules of time travel were tricky to understand at times, but I didn’t think about it too hard, since I think the true point of the book is the lesson you learn from it.
I did enjoy this read, but unfortunately, I did not enjoy it as much as I hoped. Though the premise of the book was great, the execution could have been better. For one, I found the writing to be pretty uninteresting/unimaginative and, oftentimes, repetitive. There were many times when the author wrote that “x character behaved x way because of x reason” rather than letting their personalities and mannerisms tell us what we need to know. Also, there were times when the author would repeat the same information over and over again, like the rules of time travel or what the café looked like, and I found that repetition unnecessary. These kinds of issues I had with the writing made it hard to connect with the characters on a deeper level, which was disappointing.
Overall, I did find this to be a touching book, mainly because I could relate those situations and issues back to my life, helping me better understand the lessons being taught here. I would recommend it for fans of magical realism who enjoy a quick and easy read.
Graphic: Chronic illness, Death, and Dementia
Moderate: Pregnancy
Minor: Abortion and Alcohol
3.75
It was a very enjoyable read that was at times oddly deep, at times hilarious, and always full of surprises. I, for one, did not expect a book set in the 16th century to throw in random little references to things that exist in the present! And as random as that may sound, it felt, to me, like it had a purpose. I love how kooky and weird and silly the book is, and how the art style seems to match that kooky-ness so well. It was also, at times, very educational, and it was cool learning a little history through it.
This book genuinely makes me want to read Don Quixote, so I can compare and contrast it with this interpretation of it. As much as I enjoyed it, I think I would have enjoyed it even more if I knew more about the original book. We’ll see if that ends up in my TBR list lol! Also, I would like to say that I don’t particularly think I will ever read this book again, since it’s not the type of book I’m into, but it doesn’t mean I’m not glad I read it. It was still a fun read!
Moderate: Violence
Minor: Racism and Religious bigotry
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
5.0
For fans of the MCU, a lot of the characters, scenes, plot points, and even some lines will seem very familiar. Without getting into anything specific, it was interesting reading a comic book that references things that I have seen in other Marvel series, movies, and even video games. And I think that's a really good thing - I felt like Bendis did a good job staying true to the characters that are so beloved and storylines that are so well-known. But it isn't totally 100% like the other Spider-Man media I've mentioned. It also has its own unique elements and it lets me know things about these characters' lives that I didn't know before. Also I thought it was cool to engage with Marvel media that wasn't afraid to be a bit gory and dark at times. These types of stories involve a lot of death, pain, fear, etc. and I think it did a good job addressing that part of being a superhero without being overwhelmingly dark.
Because this was my first time reading a graphic novel, I was worried that it would be pretty inaccessible to me. I thought I would have a hard time knowing where I'm supposed to read next or following the plot in general. I would say that this comic book is very easy to follow, and I did not struggle as much as I thought I would. I will say, however, that it felt like it was going in a very fast pace, and I think I'm just not used to that in books. I felt like I was meeting a lot of new characters at once, and it was a bit overwhelming. I imagine that that would be very difficult to handle as somebody who is very new to Marvel and doesn't know all those characters from other media. But maybe it is very common in comic books, and I just wouldn't know!
Overall, this was a very enjoyable read, and I'm very excited to read more comic books in the future! I would definitely love reading more of Bendis' work as well.
Moderate: Cursing, Violence, Grief, Murder, and Alcohol
Minor: Death, Gun violence, Blood, and Fire/Fire injury
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
The other points of view that were added into the story were interesting, but they did not really add much to the overall story, so I felt like the book could have gone without them. I liked that those different POVs showed how all these different characters were connected one way or another, and they also showed how other people were affected by the rules of this world Silvera created. But it just didn't really do much for the overall plot. If anything, if Silvera didn't add them to the story, he could have spent that time focusing on building the relationship between the main characters a bit more, rather than introducing a bunch of characters that we won't get to know all that well.
It was a good book, but it didn't really make me feel anything for any of the characters or the situation they were going through. A lot of people swear that this is one of the saddest books they've ever read, and it just simply did not evoke any emotion in me. It's a shame, because the overall idea behind the book is very interesting, but just not enough for me to ever want to read this book again.
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
I don't think I was the target demographic age-wise, but I think this is a book any YA lover could enjoy, especially if you are a fan of books that move at a slower pace.
Moderate: Dementia and Grief
Minor: Death, Car accident, and Fire/Fire injury
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.75
When I started reading this book, I was immediately thrown off by the writing style. The writing style is more poetic than other novels I have read, so it almost made me want to put the book down. But I stuck through it and ended up liking Lockhart's style of writing more than I expected.
About the plot:
I felt like the plot is very interesting, but I was frustrated with the fact that it starts off moving so slow, then in the last twenty pages or so, plot twist after plot twist after plot twist is revealed. I almost wish that Lockhart would have included more hints, more flashbacks throughout the story, so they wouldn't just be in the last bit of the book. But, all in all, the ending felt pretty satisfying all things considered. I wouldn't want it any other way.
About the characters:
I wanted to like the characters so bad, and a part of me did, but mostly I just had a hard time connecting to/caring about any of them. Maybe it has some thing to do with the fact that they are mega-rich and super privileged, and I'm not. They also just didn't feel like real people sometimes. But even with all that, the characters had moments that made me genuinely like them/feel bad for them/etc. I wish there would have been more character development for characters other than Cadence, then maybe I would have liked them more.
Overall:
This was a good read. I would probably reread this story, especially to better understand how Lockhart set up every chapter in preparation for the plot twist.
Graphic: Addiction and Mental illness
Moderate: Alcoholism, Death, Suicidal thoughts, Fire/Fire injury, and Alcohol
Minor: Animal death
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? N/A
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
5.0
Graphic: Body horror, Gore, Racism, Violence, Blood, and Murder
Moderate: Gun violence, Mass/school shootings, and Abortion
4.0
Since it's a nonfiction story, one may be inclined to think it would be really boring (and I will admit, some parts are a bit boring) but the author does a great job of bringing these "characters" to life. Krakauer really takes the reader on this journey with him, helping the reader better understand the journey Chris McCandless went through that led him to his untimely death in Alaska. I like that we not only learn more about McCandless's life: We also see Krakauer reflect on his personal experiences, provide historical information and connect it to McCandless's story, try to uncover the cause of McCandless's death, etc. I will say that I was even moved by McCandless's philosophy through this book. Before I even read the book, I had made preconceived notions about McCandless so I disliked him for all the reasons other people who learned about him after his death disliked him: He seemed pretentious, he did something reckless, etc. But I grew to appreciate him more through this book (though I still don't really like him very much). I think there's a lesson to be learned in that.
Final thoughts: Krakauer's writing is what compelled me to finish this book the most. Sometimes I forgot that I was reading a nonfiction book because he did such a good job storytelling in a way that makes the reader feel like they are there with him/with Chris. I would probably read this one again!
Graphic: Death
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? N/A
3.75
It wasn't a totally painful read for these reasons:
- The book does a good job of explaining the sorts of issues people of color face by providing the reader with many realistic experiences.
- As a Latine, I’m so happy to see a Young Adult novel that represents many different Latine cultures.
- After reading books by authors who think all teenagers talk like walking thesauruses, it was cool to read a book about teenagers who act and talk like teenagers (though I will add the use of slang was a bit unnatural and cringy at times).
- It's a very fast-paced novel, which was helpful for me considering I'm getting back into regularly reading for fun after years of not doing so.
No matter how much I wanted to like this book, however, it was very boring to me. One thing that I love about books is the way that one can connect with the characters because they feel so real. When it comes to this novel, De Leon’s characters are so two-dimensional that I was left not really caring what happens to them. The characters and the sorts of issues they face didn’t draw me in as much as I thought they would. It seems like De Leon wrote this book simply to address the social issues each character faces while not bothering to give any of the characters the depth that would make them seem human. Also, the book reads more like a stream of consciousness, with Liliana going through her day almost as if writing in her diary, so it lacks scenes and dialogue for the most part. I wish that De Leon would have followed one of the basic rules of writing: Show, don’t tell. But De Leon’s general lack of interesting dialogue, concrete imagery, and moving scenes added to my already lack of interest in the novel. There were more problems I had with this book but to keep this short(ish), I'll only mention those.
This book does have some really good elements that made it worth reading and I really appreciate what De Leon was trying to do with this novel, but I don’t think it was executed to the best of its ability. The important message gets lost because I can’t get past the bad writing. I will probably not be rereading, honestly.
Graphic: Bullying and Racism