Scan barcode
jefferz's reviews
120 reviews
5.0
Now on to the actual review, I'll be the first to admit that historical fiction and Hollywood's Golden age are not areas that I'm hugely familiar with or naturally gravitate towards. That being said, it almost doesn't matter thanks to Perry's engaging storytelling and narration writing. Apart from the overall plot of Dexter Gaines's breakthrough in Hollywood and eventual drama and romance, the synopsis doesn't really reveal much about what actually happens in the story (in my opinion, partly to its detriment). However immediately from the get-go, the story takes off with a dramatic opening chapter with Dexter Gaines discovering famed Hollywood producer Milford Langen passed away in the present day (90's), then immediately jumping to New Years Eve 1951. Even with no knowledge of what where the story is going, Dexter Gaines is an easy and fun read. Trhough progressions covering the industry gatekeeping of Hollywood, to adjusting to life in Hollywood, to early film roles and entanglement with professionals, the novel is consistently interesting to read. While the prose is accessible and the story easy enough to follow, there's an underlying sense of quality and finesse evident everywhere. The writing has a perfect balance of narration/internal thoughts to spoken dialogue and the story never feels like its dragging or overwritten. Besides good pacing, I appreciated the gradual build in intensity and drama that sneaks up on you. Most of the novel consists of Dexter reflecting on how exciting his time with Lillian and Milly in the past, yet the advance knowledge that everything ultimately ends in disaster adds weight to some otherwise seemingly casual encounters. As the drama and conflicting feelings ramp up, the story's final 150 pages are completely compelling and the conclusion is satisfying and moving.
Another area that I found particularly well-done is the portrayal of historic Hollywood and the film industry. From the visual descriptions of grandeur and wealth at Milly's estate, to the backlot 20th Century Studios, to the extravagant parties and hushed activities in the shadows, Perry really immerses the reader in the time period that's both slightly romanticized for nostalgic effect yet also entirely stark and realistic in the areas that matter to the story. It's hard to describe in words but there's an inherent sense of class that is layered into every chapter (I loved the descriptions and handling of copious amounts of smoking). An early chapter that features Dexter/Dan walking in on a closed door party of producers discussing the intrusion of the home television set and future TV network on film industry is a perfect example of how detailed the novel's historical elements are.
The story is also full of celebrities that range from producers, to agents, to actors that all feel relatively well-represented and believable. Again this is not an area that I personally have a lot of knowledge in, for example having no experience with Tallulah Bankhead's work, but I've heard other readers praise and love her appearance in the story so I'll defer to others on that. Oddly enough, not knowing who majority of the celebrities are made it interesting whenever original fictional characters or productions are introduced in the story. While reading, I would frequently would Google names and movies to try and figure out who and what was original vs historic, Perry's fictional work is that good and seamless.
Besides the obvious film industry element, the bigger story element is the LGBTQ+/Queer storyline told within the constraints of the 1950's. As one can imagine, the 1950's were anything but kind to everything outside of the hetero-normative lifestyle. While reading the story, I will openly admit that I initially wondered if the novel was purposely mislabeled as queer for recent trending marketability considering there was almost no indication or notable content remotely queer. However having read the story, it is 100% there, it just takes some time to get to it at roughly the half-way mark. The delay and lack of queer content early-on is intentional by design, completely for narrative purposes and made its first appearance far more impactful. As one can expect for 1950's Hollywood, themes of forbidden longing, self-hatred, passion vs responsibility, and the fear of the press are all included and developed well. The book's synopsis (and to a lesser extent, my review) purposely don't go into too much detail to avoid giving away crucial plot developments, but what I can say is that Perry's portrayal of queer Hollywood and characters caught in personal dilemmas are excellent. The complications between the three focal characters, the studio industry, friends and strangers, it's really well done. The theme of "if only things were different" is powerfully used and the extent of how much Dexter, Milly, and Lillian's lives are affected by situations out of their control is immense. I would've never expected it based on the synopsis or going into the book at the beginning, but Milly and Lillian's end is heartbreaking and will resonate with any queer or marginalized group, particularly older ones who may unfortunately empathize with their grief and prospective "lost years".
It's not really important to the story but I do feel the need to touch on it, as previously discussed with its old City of Whores title, there is adult sexual content but its very tastefully handled and placed. By extension, I also wouldn't necessarily call it spicy or steamy, but that is clearly not the intent or readership this novel is written for. I would say this is partly a romance-drama genre novel in the traditional sense of it having romantic feelings involved, not the contemporary romance style that is populated on booktok and trending lists. I also read a few other negative reviews, a choice ones being "too gay to be straight and too straight to be gay" that I found utterly laughable. To call this book too straight to be gay is missing the entire point of the story, the historical fiction framework of the 1950's, and entirely erasing the B and Q in LGBTQ+. I can also see this story resonating powerfully for queer readers who are not publicly out or those that do not fall identify as strictly "gay" (the horrors of being seen and self-hatred some characters experience can and will hit close to home). But even outside of the queer community there's a lot to like, particularly Lillian's complex relationships and emotional vs physical love and affection.
As mentioned in my FTC disclaimer above, I received an ARC of this novel to read and review. Out of the ARC's I've reviewed so far, And Introducing Dexter Gaines might be one of the most pleasant surprises and a sleeper hit I ordinarily wouldn't have casually picked to read (and certainly not when it was titled City of Whores). While the republished version does improve considerably on the initial version, I do think that there are marketing elements that still don't represent the book as well as they could. The typography and font choice looks a bit unprofessional and cheaply tacked on and the synopsis details of "attempted murder, stardom/survival" feel like a misdirection towards a thriller or a constant Hollywood backstabbing tale (there is betrayal but it's not in the forefront focus). This is a quality, classy, effectively written and moving queer story that deserves attention and a read when it is publicly published. Expertly crafted and paced, complex and nuanced, and most of all engaging to read, I loved this novel and really have nothing bad to say about it.
Graphic: Animal death, Cursing, and Homophobia
Moderate: Death, Drug use, Sexual content, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Violence, Dementia, Grief, and Outing
Minor: Suicide and Stalking
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
Additionally the ending is a bit too happily ever after for my taste and the epilogue really didn’t add anything of value. I personally feel that the novel might’ve been stronger without the epilogue that doesn’t contain any important and is just irrelevant fluff.
Graphic: Sexual content
Minor: Violence, Kidnapping, Death of parent, and Alcohol
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
The main highlight for me and the area Heather Fawcett was consistently strong in was the folklore aspect layered into the story. Emily Wilde’s Encyclopaedia of Faeries is full of lengthy and detailed stories told by the villagers of Hrafnsvik, encounters with the Fair folk, and even recapped from Emily’s own research. These stories placed in self-contained chapters are often longer than non-folklore chapters given that the story is presented via Emily’s written journal, some entries being extremely short and uneventful. These stories all have some sort of theme that connects to whatever Emily is experiencing at the time, and the imaginative quality of these tales often surpasses the novel’s actual story itself (like modern Grimm fairy tales).
The interest within these stories is also heightened due to how slow, tedious, and bland the main story can be. This novel has an unfortunate tendency to flip flop between large stretches of quiet, humble rural living and exploration, then suddenly throwing the story into action with lack of transitions. The slower chapters can mostly be summarized as Emily bumbling around the rural village, struggling to do basic country living necessities, verbally sparring with her academic coworker Wendell Bambleby, and doing a bit of research in the field. I personally found these sections to be extremely slow, boring, and quite repetitive. Based on the book’s synopsis and Emily’s credentials as an expert in the study of faeries, I was disappointed in the low amount of actual research and scholastic work she does. Apart from one common fae she encounters near her cabin lodging and one unusual child in the village, Emily doesn’t actually do any research on her own and her only discoveries are all done through her own fumbling or them falling right into her lap. At times her scholastic background felt like it was only included as an explanation to why she’s so poor at social interactions (a tired and lazy academia trope in my opinion) and for her to pull out random fae tidbits and world-building points out of thin air, as opposed to these being incorporated organically into the story. This novel also follows that modern trend of using excessive footnotes that often include unnecessary detail or those that could’ve been written into the main text itself with slight editing.
In between the numerous slow chapters, the novel would suddenly break into more serious and action-based chapters that felt out of place in the otherwise simple story. Without giving away any major spoilers, Emily’s encounters with the “Hidden Ones” feels herky jerky and rushed, going from no knowledge and previous appearances, to throwing Emily right into the heart of a festival gathering and icy kingdom power struggle. While I appreciated the direction the story was going and the plot advancements that I felt were desperately needed, the transition seemed almost non-existent and each step in that direction felt increasingly random and baffling. I spent the majority of the last third of the book wondering why the rest of the book wasted its pages on random rural slice of life moments when it could’ve spent more time setting up its chilly and more ambitious High folk chapters. I suspect this lack of setup and abrupt shift contributes quite a few negative reviews that preferred the slow exploration chapters compared to the later kingdom-focused chapters. These chapters also felt incredibly rushed and the escalating conflict in the frozen forest just sort of ends in an abrupt and anti-climatic manner. The actions and resolution of the King at the novel’s end frankly doesn’t make sense and conflicts with his own motivations at the start of the sequence. A major threat to the village is also avoided simply by the villagers asking the fae to stop it who are notoriously difficult to appease. This felt like a copout and lazy way of just cutting short all of the novel’s loose ends.
Like the story, I thought the novel's characters were good on paper but the execution was also not to my taste. Emily’s character was incredibly off-putting to me but not due to her personality or scholastic morals. Beyond finding social interactions difficult, she repeatedly comes off as a stuck up know-it-all yet doesn’t display either book smart or field smart knowledge to back it up. The novel’s story is basically Emily making an absolute oaf of herself and offending everyone and everything around her, all while also being a bit of a damsel in distress city girl for the villagers or Bambleby to save her. For a character who is intended to be smart, she suffers from the stupid protagonist syndrome where the main character consistently makes the obvious worst choice repeatedly. And that can be excusable if the book demonstrated or showed how accomplished Emily can be when she’s in her element, but the only proof of that is Heather Fawcett repeatedly telling the reader she is an expert and professional rather than actually showing it much.
Popular, entitled, and pretty boy Bambleby felt better executed and more well-rounded, though a good deal of that could be chalked up to the added humor his presence brought. I was about to DNF this book fifty pages in and only kept going due to Bambleby’s introduction that added more energy to the story. Emily and Bambleby’s light bickering was another bright spot for me with a pretty good banter and their differences in morals to be interesting. Perhaps I should admit I also experienced a good deal of schadenfreude whenever Bambleby would drag Emily and make fun of her due to how unlikeable and unintelligent I found her. While I found their character chemistry to have good material to work with, the romance aspect also felt underdeveloped and rushed. Apart from slightly too long glances and a constant irritated fascination with his wavy blonde hair, there’s not a whole lot of romance in the story despite it being a main selling point of the novel. An unexpectedly dangerous encounter suddenly causes Emily to do a 180 on her feelings (both romantically and towards the folk and villagers) which felt jarring and poorly planned out. The entire romance subplot felt forced and rushed, making its intended implication during the frozen kingdom chapters all the more silly as the drama doesn’t feel earned. Characters outside of the two main characters were mostly forgettable, particularly the adult villagers who I often struggled to remember who was who due to having relatively similar names and similar characterizations.
At times, Fawcett’s visual imagery of Hrafnsvik and its frozen countryside was beautiful, especially when Emily is out in nature attempting to do a bit of research or when Emily first enters the land of the Hidden Ones. As previously mentioned, the folklore aspect and storytelling within those tales was compelling, something the main story could’ve used more of. Unfortunately outside of those two areas, the rest of the writing style and tone didn’t really work for me. The story consistently felt overwritten and unnecessarily indirect, as if to give the novel a scholastic edge considering the book is written from the perspective of Emily’s journal. The end result however felt overly wordy and tiring to read, with a great deal of focus on the mundane rather than plot elements or character growth. While I found the fae storyline to be decent when the book chose to focus on it, I felt like there simply wasn’t enough plot to justify a 300+ page book. The writing felt like it was constantly trying to pad its core plot with unnecessary fluff (what some have found to be cozy) when it could’ve instead addressed the plot crunch at the end of the book. The world-building also felt kind of sporadic and random with new elements being thrown out arbitrarily. I found it impressive how many different historic folklore stories and cultural elements Fawcett was able to incorporate in the Emily Wilde’s world, but the actual world of the High folk kingdom felt like it was being made up on the fly and I still have very little understanding of just what Cambridge or academia even knows about them. This will obviously be explored and built on in subsequent novels but the world-building within this book felt inadequate in the areas that count and excessive in details that have little to do with the story.
As a whole, Emily Wilde’s Encyclopaedia of Faeries was a complete miss for me and a book I probably should’ve have DNF-ed if I wasn’t such a stubborn and persistent reader, but there’s a lot to like for those looking for a somewhat cozy read. The novel had all the right pieces but some unusual focal choices and the overwritten yet sparse story left me severely underwhelmed, resorting to skimming in places just to finish it. However on the bright side, I saw a lot of promising signs that the sequel novel Emily Wilde’s Map of the Otherlands is heading in the right direction with more world-building and research (though any focus on Brambleby is a smart move), and the closing tale of the Golden Ravens in this book had more foreshadowing and interest than most of the rest of the novel. I will not be continuing this series but it sounds like it will become far more rewarding and developed (the synopsis of the recently announced 3rd novel sounds like the most interesting one yet!) but if you like slower-paced reads and fae-focused fantasy stories, let me know how it ends!
Moderate: Death and Violence
Minor: Animal death, Child death, and Alcohol
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
On the plus side, I quite enjoyed FMC Gretchen’s spiky personality and devious wit. Constantly trying to plan out her moves, both to convince Charlie that his farm is haunted and to safeguard her investment with her spirit medium client, I thought the first half of the book worked quite well; albeit feeling a bit slow for my taste. Although her sparring and enemies to friends to lovers arc with Charlie was good, her enemies to friends banter with the ghost Everett was the real highlight for me. Everett really steals the show and his plot threads involving his situation on the farm and his relationship to its owners was interesting to read. I would go as far to say my star rating would've been lower had Everett not been so silly and fun to read about.
Despite this book being classified as a contemporary romance novel, Everett’s light supernatural elements were more involved than I was expecting and were quite compelling! The curse involving the Waybill family, while comical at first, actually had a lot of promise. Assuming Gretchen was able to convince Charlie not to sell the farm, Everett’s future and potential end (or lack of end) could’ve gone in so many interesting directions. And then in the last one fourth of the book, everything falls apart with a poorly chosen plot twist and previously omitted detail to his curse.
Mrs. Nash’s Ashes caught me off-guard with how fast things spiraled towards its end but at least I could tell what Alder was trying to do. My Happy Medium’s plot twist however, mildly offended me by how insulting it was to the reader. The drama and implications of the curse, Everett’s eternal haunting, the potential sacrifice Gretchen potentially made (questionable character logic aside that can be attributed to her internal doubts and demons), I didn’t know how the book was going to resolve such a great setup. I don’t know what I was expecting but it was certainly anything but what the book gave me. It’s a happily ever after, everything works out kind of resolution that feels so cheap, lazy, and a complete copout. The book said something about it being a got'cha moment, and I fully felt that got'cha reaction in all the wrong ways.
Besides the unfortunate ending note, Happy Medium was otherwise quite pleasant and steady. Gretchen and Charlie’s relationship progresses very slowly, as well as her plotting ways to prevent the farm from being sold. As the story changes from how to stop the sale to how to save the farm, Gretchen’s brainstorming of business ideas was great. I also really liked the parts where Gretchen was able to use her effective (albeit often misused) skills of social engineering and intuitiveness to improve the farm's business. Having worked directly with the food and agriculture industry at my day job, these business strategies were clever and real ideas that could work in practice. The humor was neither unhinged enough to make me laugh nor was it clever enough to entertain me, but it was decently written and executed. There were some great themes included such as seeing others as friends vs acquaintances, avoidance tactics encouraged by past abandonment, and the morality of lying for others’ benefit. A lot of these themes were introduced and initially handled well at first, only for Happy Medium then lack the finesse to pull them off. And that sentiment is almost verbatim what I also wrote in <a href="https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/6331766090" target="blank">Nash’s review.</a> Speaking of Mrs. Nash's Ashes, Hollis Hollenbeck has a very small cameo in Happy Medium if you read it before this one (it's a very small Easter egg reference however that's almost not worth mentioning).
Despite the unfortunate narrative choices made in the back half of the book, Happy Medium is indeed quite a happy and cozy read. Even at their worst, Gretchen and Charlie are charming enough to read about and Everett’s presence more than makes up for whenever the main plot’s interest starts to dip. It’s just a shame that Sarah Adler again cooked up a stellar premise that she couldn’t pull off yet again. While not quite as disappointing as Mrs. Nash’s Ashes questionable ending, there’s definitely a lot of other novels with a similar tone that I’d likely recommend over this one. Unless you have a thing for Goat Farms that is, and this is coming from a reader that actually does regulatory work with Goat Dairy Farms.
Moderate: Cursing, Death, Sexual content, and Alcohol
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Death, Violence, Blood, and Murder
Moderate: Cursing, Drug use, Infertility, Sexual content, Vomit, Alcohol, and Sexual harassment
Minor: Self harm, Kidnapping, and Stalking
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Moderate: Bullying, Sexual content, and Alcohol
Minor: Bullying and Death of parent
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.0
The main highlight of the novel is Gaiman’s effective juxtaposition of how events or people are seen and interpreted between children and adults. Starting with the narrator and his father’s discovery of a man who committed suicide in their stolen car, the story gradually leans towards a fantasy angle involving magic, monsters, and other worlds. Due to his young age as well as how much time has passed since the events occurred, you’re left wondering how much of the story was real (if any at all) or how much was a child’s imagination running wild while scared. I enjoyed reading this book from a critical reading standpoint (to a point), attempting to analyze and interpret how these different occurrences could’ve happened if they were instead experienced by an adult.
The prose is mostly functional and not overly lyrical, but has a frank, matter of fact character voice that I like that is occasionally quite poetic. I’ve seen a bunch of reviews criticizing that the narrator’s character is bland and the weakest element of the story. However, I personally thought it was well done and captured the nature of an introverted, book-loving shy child which served as a good foil to “neighbor” Lettie’s vibrance or really all of the Hemstock family’s contrasting dynamics. The prologue chapter featuring the narrator as a middle-aged adult perfectly sets the simple, yet reflective tone and is the hook that got me excited for the impending and highlighted darkness and commentary on what makes us human.
Unfortunately as the story progressed, I increasingly felt like I wasn’t going to get that. Perhaps I have darker standards than the norm or expected far worse based on reviews mentioning child abuse/neglect angle, but there’s really only one notable scene involving child abuse/violence and rest being familial discourse and drama. As the tense atmosphere grows, the story leans heavier into fantasy elements that feel sporadic and random. On one hand I understand that Gaiman is trying to capture the wild imagination and mind of a child. However the story leans into the unexplainable otherworldly angle so hard that I found it increasingly difficult to follow where the plot and themes were going. I previously reviewed Kazuo Ishiguro’s Klara and the Sun which was another novel that highlighted dark parental topics through the eyes of a child which I found very effective so I’m not against the concept, but the execution of this one felt messy and unfocused.
The metaphorical symbolism of what the narrator experienced grew fainter and fainter, particularly in the second half of the book when Lettie confronts the main antagonist of the story. The sequence felt unnecessarily drawn out (particularly everything involving the varmites after) to stretch the story out of the novella category and to add a call back to the book’s title. In my opinion, that entire run of 40 pages could’ve been cut entirely and all of the narrator’s great internalized fears manifested into reality could’ve been reworked into the confrontation with the main antagonist. And to be sure there were some great quotes, but they felt like a series of beautiful vignettes that were moving on their own while messy and vague when strung together. As the last few chapters ended, I was left baffled thinking “well that was something I guess”.
Despite being well-written and conceptually interesting, I felt like I missed something both from an emotional angle and a literary analysis angle. What started off tonally solid just grew more outlandish and abstract as it progressed and there’s frankly some very strange and bizarre choices that almost seem comedic, in direct contrast to the tone this book is going for. This is my first real Neil Gaiman read (I loved watching the adaptation of Good Omens and the very little I read of American gods years ago) and I can tell that nearly all my personal nitpicks with The Ocean At the End of the Lane has to do with the story and ideas, not Gaiman’s actual writing or style. Case and point, I loved the prologue and epilogue more than the rest of the book. My overall impression is that the book was quite messy and jarring, which somewhat makes sense after reading Gaiman’s acknowledgements covering the novel’s origin of a short story that was reworked and expanded to be a novel; the original short story synopsis sounded like it would’ve been much more to my taste with less distracting elements.
Moderate: Child abuse, Death, Infidelity, Suicide, and Gaslighting
Minor: Sexual content
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
One of the primary reasons why I believe Flux has such polarizing reviews is due to the complexity of its plot and characters on top of the abstract presentation of the focal company, Flux. Presented from the perspectives of three individuals clearly from different years, the stories have zero hand-holding for the reader and forces you to to keep track of each narrative and characters that have seemingly nothing in common. I’m not going to recap what’s already discussed in the book’s synopsis but of the three characters, Brandon’s perspective makes up the bulk of the story initially. All three stories are incredibly detailed and my brain was both fascinated and sometimes struggled to process all that was happening, which is mostly character and family-centered drama. I am the type of reader that loves and craves complex and high-concept novels so this wasn’t necessarily a problem, but I can easily see the vast majority of readers not making it past the first 50-60 pages and finding many parts slow.
To make matters more interesting, Brandon’s storyline is very unapologetically queer but not in the typical rainbow colored or prideful “yas” manner. The character voice and reactions are entirely millennial and the social commentary is absolutely cutting, more than enough to alienate younger genz/alpha and older readers. His storyline also incorporates elements of being biracial and the complexities of being Asian American on top of being unlabeled yet clearly queer. While I personally felt completely (and at times quite uncomfortably) seen by this novel, I often wondered and worried how the story and content would land with readers outside of these specific groups that I so happen to be in. Pop culture references (RIP twitter), generational ideology, even subtle jabs at ethnic white knighting and being entirely politically correct further cement Flux’s millennial flavor and views.
A good portion of the book also heavily focuses on an in-universe 80’s police cop television show called Raiders. Brandon’s entire story is written in 2nd person directed to the main character of this television show which is an incredibly unique concept. Being from the 80’s, Raiders features intentionally questionable Asian stereotypes but also provides representation, areas that Flux heavily comments and reflects on. The sheer level of detail in Raiders, it’s individual ep storylines, the shift in its production, controversies surrounding it’s main actor, its lasting impact the show has on Bo and Brandon, it is incredible. And Raiders isn’t even the plot’s main focus.
When it comes to Flux’s science fiction angle, the mechanics and speculative fiction elements are quite vague and involve the concept of vast bioenergy that has unexpected effects. Flux’s entire being, its fall from grace, and its founder are unmistakably inspired by Elizabeth Holmes and Theranos, albeit in an entirely different industry and field. While elements of time travel and realities are important aspects, they feel more of a plot mechanism to facilitate and connect the events between the three storylines; the “what then” is more important than the “how”. While the concepts behind Flux’s sci fi elements made sense and were completely functional, I felt that they were playing the supporting act to Chong’s intense and emotional familial drama which was stellar (particularly impressive since familial drama is not one of my preferred reading genres/interests).
As I progressed through the book, I progressively felt like the science fiction elements were unevenly distributed, its first 150 pages in particular. While I have nothing bad to say once the book hits the 70% mark, its first third felt oddly lacking in this area and while the content was excellent, the read felt slow and unfocused. Part of this may be attributed to the book’s synopsis of a neo-noir, time-traveling story to cover murder. While not necessarily wrong, I felt that the synopsis is a poor representation of the book’s tone and focus (though admittedly, this is a very difficult book to write a synopsis for without giving away spoilers). Having completed the book, I acknowledge that its initially slower pacing is completely by design. I was in complete awe at how every scene across all three characters was connected and free of any obvious plot holes. However to get the full impact of the book’s plot twist at the two thirds mark when it pulls a move reminiscent of Inception, the reader is required to have paid full attention through the copious amounts of slice of life and familial drama. The emotional payoff in Blue’s (and to a lesser extent Brandon’s) final chapters is stunning. I’m also a sucker for quiet toned epilogue chapters, and the book’s ending was exactly what I wanted. Yet, I have a growing suspicion that the vast majority of potential readers will never be able to appreciate it due to how difficult the preceding content is to follow.
Despite how fully realized and deep Flux’s three characters and storylines are, the sheer amount of details is also my biggest nitpick with Flux (primary reason for a 4.5 rating bumped down). Between the fictional 80’s show Raiders itself, the real-life cast and production behind the show, Brandon’s recruitment into the company Flux, Flux’s core purpose and technology, exploration of tragedy and grief tearing people apart, self identity and culture, there is so much going on and I found myself often wondering if all of these details are important and crucial to Flux’s main story. While the vast majority of the details are, I often felt like the sheer scope of Flux’s ambitions was getting away at times. There was so much content about Raiders’ storyline and episodes, and while they were very detailed and realistic, it sometimes felt like it was too much or irrelevant. Every episode or scene in Raiders has a direct relation to something that affects Bo, Brandon or Blue, however I often felt like a lot less would have still gotten the job done while avoiding losing or confusing more casual readers. Brandon’s day to day movements during his employment at Flux also felt like they were occasionally veering into unnecessary territory, particularly some of Brandon’s almost sexual romps. Again, I personally did not mind them particularly due to Chong’s critical underlying social commentary plus queer representation, but I’ve seen other reviewers criticize these scenes for being crude or vulgar when taken at face value (I do not personally agree, and found a particular review that went off about how no gay man drinks that much milk to be hilariously terrible).
Flux’s science fiction’s element also felt like it was executed in a manner that made it difficult for casual readers to follow or stay invested in due to the plotting and pacing. Most of the book’s storyline has minor intentional inconsistencies that serve as the hook to the book’s time and reality altering climax, but they’re sometimes subtle and easy to overlook (this one begs to be read more than once). Compared to the amount of character drama and grief that is somewhat separate from the science fiction angle, the balance felt a bit off and at times, you could almost forget the science fiction elements exist. Once Flux’s, well, Flux kicks in, it’s relentless and is easy to become lost. That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but I couldn't help but wish the science fiction angle somehow couldn’t be spaced more evenly while still maintaining its Inception/Matrix moment; I loved the way a particular world-glitching scene is written with the stuttering dialogue and scenes recap.
If it wasn’t already evident, I personally loved Flux but fully realize that I am part of a very narrow niche group of readers that are able to fully appreciate everything it accomplishes. The character work and representation is excellent and more importantly, has completely different things to say and comment on compared to many other books or media that tackle similar topics. The characters are fully realized, complex, and heavily flawed, the area that Flux excels the most in. It’s just a shame that I feel very few readers will also experience Flux fully due to how complex it is to follow and how tricky its presentation and flavor can be. The sometimes unfocused scope of details and the science fiction element running a bit wide are perhaps small signs of Flux being a debut novel, however I am very impressed by the quality of Chong’s writing and sky high ambition and am eagerly looking forward to his upcoming novel I Leave It Up to You. I always feel a bit awkward mentioning that I generally am less interested in reading about familial drama and Asian American experiences (despite being Asian American myself), but the fact that Chong was able to get me so invested in both topics within his excellent writing is a huge accomplishment.
The above review is based on a complimentary copy for review purposes provided by Melville House Publishing via Netgalley, thanks for the reviewing opportunity.
Graphic: Cursing, Sexual content, and Grief
Moderate: Child death, Death, Infidelity, Racism, Terminal illness, Violence, Dementia, Kidnapping, Death of parent, Murder, and Alcohol
Minor: Drug use, Suicide, Xenophobia, Pregnancy, Cultural appropriation, and Gaslighting
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
3.0
Carrying over majority of Kingfisher’s original cast characters outside of Edgar Allen Poe’s (with the exception of Dr. Denton who is apparently featured as a main character in the upcoming 3rd novella due to be published next year), What Feasts At Night benefits from all of the exposition and Gallacia world-building that was previously introduced in the first book. I had previously critiqued how the first book’s start felt too slow due to the numerous tangents referencing Easton’s home country that felt irrelevant to that book’s story. However, with all of the exposition previously covered, it allows this book to start with its own story from the get-go, immediately establishing the quiet and eerie ambiance attributed to the lodge’s remote and isolated location. Like What Moves the Dead, this story also has unsettling “horror” elements that are explored using a fairly grounded approach, with science and superstitions that feel appropriate for the time period. This shared the same strengths of the first book with Easton’s character/no-nonsense narration (always appreciated vs the typical over-reactive horror protagonist), humor, and immersive storytelling.
Unlike the first entry, this one didn’t have source material to work off of and while I found the story to be generally well done, I felt that this one was a bit overwritten for its fairly sparse plot. As colorful and well thought out Kingfisher’s details of Gallacia were, I constantly wished that the book would focus on the core story as the pacing felt quite slow and unfocused for two thirds of the book. There’s a good deal of “In Gallacia, we do this, we do that, etc etc” which unfortunately started to get repetitive for me. However, I suspect that there wouldn't have been enough content and story to pad out the full novella length without the added embellishments. That being said, although I personally was less invested in Gallacia and Easton’s sworn soldier plot threads compared to the horror angle, other readers might find the material more interesting. Unlike the first book that quickly foreshadows the spooky entity and situation at play, this one doesn’t mention its focal hallmark until 50 pages in, then their first full appearance at page 88. Normally I’m all for slow burn stories but when the entire book is only 147 pages (for the hardcover first edition), I need a stronger hook or more foreshadowing.
My other biggest gripe that other reviewers have previously commented on is despite being listed as a horror novella crossing over with fantasy, there’s really only about 30 pages of true horror content that occurs in one condensed sequence. Compared to What Moves the Dead’s more consistent horror distribution and pacing, this one felt imbalanced and end-heavy. The rest of the book mostly pushes a sedatephobia angle (silence) and cultural superstition that left me a bit underwhelmed and uninterested from a horror-standpoint. What Moves the Dead also had a good amount of gothic flavor due to Poe’s original decrepit estate setting and base characters that heightened Kingfisher’s original ideas, flavor that I found to be notably lacking in this story. I also felt that while the cover & jacket art design and title was stylistically a perfect compliment to the first book, they felt like poor representations of the book’s content. Without going into too much details and spoilers, “Feasting at night” sort of makes sense in a liberal abstraction interpretation but the eroding horse reference on the cover was such a very brief scene in this book that wasn’t particularly relevant compared to how noteworthy the rabbits and mushrooms were in their book’s plot.
Overall I thought Kingfisher’s followup to the solid first Sworn Soldier entry was well-written, though it definitely left me quite underwhelmed and wanting more at its conclusion. It’s hard to compared the two books since the first one utilized famous, critically-acclaimed material as its base vs this one that was fully original, so I’m definitely willing to give her upcoming third entry a shot; an added bonus is a foreboding abandoned mine is a much more interesting setting to me than a rural hunting lodge. I think this novella is ultimately worth a read for those looking for slightly eerie vibes with late 19th century embellishments. However, for mainstream horror or more intense reads, I would probably recommend looking elsewhere.
Moderate: Animal death, Body horror, Cursing, and Death
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Part unsolved crime journalism, part familial teenage drama, Julie Clark’s The Ghostwriter is a split perspective thriller featuring storytelling within storytelling. Slow and meticulously paced, this novel follows author Olivia Dumont who is forced to confront her past and her family’s dark history when she accepts a ghostwriting job for her own father Vincent Taylor, a popular and famous author whose life is haunted by accusations that he murdered his two siblings fifty years ago. Featuring a well planned out (and at times tragic) story full of twists and surprises, The Ghostwriter is an engrossing read that transports the reader back to the 1970’s. While subjectively some of the familial drama and teenage sibling quarreling wasn’t my preferred genre or content, I still found Clark’s novel to be well-constructed, complex, and an interesting read.
Alternating back and forth between Olivia’s interviews with Vincent retelling events from his youth and the first-person perspective experiences of several characters in the 1970’s, The Ghostwriter has a lot of different plot elements carefully woven together. Despite being recapped out of chronological order and often out of context, the story and plot are easy enough to follow and start in familiar, well-covered territory. Thrillers utilizing a writer recapping past horrific events seems to be growing into its own trope as of late but Clark’s novel sets itself apart from the rest through its visual portrayal of Ojai, California in the 1970’s as well as its engrossing storytelling. Within the novel itself, Olivia acknowledges how good of a storyteller her father is and I fully concur. Vincent’s (and via his narration, Clark’s) tone in the early interviews with his daughter Olivia were a highlight for me and I found the first half of the book to be a page-turner. The pacing, balance of exposition and visual details, the small town valley feel of Ojai, I loved it. Vincent’s oral recaps to Olivia are followed by his experiences written in first-person perspective as they occur in real-time in the 70’s. These experiences initially are exclusive to Vincent but eventually grow to also include Danny and Poppy, Vincent’s two siblings that were murdered. Clark uses the unreliable narrator perfectly, adding layers to Vincent’s story as well as purposefully muddying the details. Olivia questions whether what she’s told is true or a lie, whether her father’s deteriorating mental cognition is at play, or if he misinterpreted what he experienced. As Danny and Poppy’s perspectives are added and as Olivia investigates further in the present, the details and timelines increasingly conflict and nothing makes sense (completely by design).
As the book transitions into its 2nd half, the focus starts to shift more heavily towards the past and the family/friend dynamics in Ojai. Dysfunctional, unhealthy, and full of miscommunication, the back half of the book and events in the 1970’s consists almost entirely of relationship drama, teenage angst, and conflict. While the content was elaborate, well-written and narratively quite strong, familial drama isn’t my cup of tea and I found my interest waning despite the strong narrative developments (I picked this is up based on my interest in the unreliable narrator and crime investigation aspect, the teenage familial relationship emphasis wasn’t prominently mentioned in the synopsis). The second half of the book also features Olivia doing more traditional investigating via remaining living Ojai residents which I found to be less engaging and more typical for the thriller genre compared to Vincent’s great storytelling. This section of the book also has more of a focus on Olivia herself with her partner Tom, her estrangement with both of her parents, and the damage to her literary career, content that is objectively good but unfortunately wasn’t as interesting to me. The book also doesn’t reveal the most crucial plot twists until the last 40 pages or so (this last section recapturing the page-turning interest of the first half of the book) but when it does, it’s quite satisfying. The book’s conclusion and reveal of what Olivia ultimately believes happened, I thought was well done and though I fully guessed the ending and the plot twist reveals (a mix of well-placed clues/foreshadowing and my familiarity with crime procedurals), I can see many readers being caught off guard by the true events that happened on that unfortunate June 1975 evening.
While the overall story is well written and conceptualized, I felt the book slightly suffered from the unlikable character syndrome apart from Poppy who has all the heart and soul in the book. Clark’s characters are deeply flawed and many are quite judgmental (apart from Olivia, consistent with the socio political atmosphere of the time), which can make them both interesting to read about yet somewhat difficult to like (I found myself often at odds with Olivia’s choices and mentality personally). However, the characters have layers to them and are eventually revealed to all be dealing with their own demons internally.
While Olivia and the main Taylor siblings are well covered, I would’ve liked to see more character development for Lydia due to her prominent connection to the murders in the past and to Olivia in the present. The Ghostwriter portrays each of the Taylors as their dynamics and relationships change, often exacerbating the stress of each other. However, the story largely omitted Lydia’s personality early in the story, lacking the basis to show how her character was affected over the course of the book's events. Compared to other characters that have more moments and attention, the reader is simply told how different she was prior to the events in the 70's. The lack of focus on her character also affected the impact of Olivia’s discoveries of her in the present and the book never really explains why she left and cut-off Olivia when she was a child (not to mention her separation from Vincent). I also found Olivia’s relationship and dynamic with Tom to be another weak spot due both Tom’s character and his relationship being bland and shallow. I acknowledge that Olivia’s partner has very little to do with the core story so I don’t necessarily fault the book for not spending much time exploring their relationship, but their miscommunication and relationship often feels like a minor distraction from the book’s more compelling content.
Despite some of the 2nd half of the book not necessarily being my preferred genre/content and minor reservations on certain plot elements, I still appreciated how detailed The Ghostwriter was. Well-written and well-plotted, I thought this was a great slow burn type of thriller full of vignettes that really takes you back to the 70’s (or so I would imagine had I been alive back then-). Unrelated to the story, the book cover and graphic art is outstanding both from a design and narrative standpoint.
Moderate: Alcoholism, Animal death, Bullying, Cursing, Death, Drug use, Emotional abuse, Misogyny, Pedophilia, Rape, Sexual assault, Terminal illness, Toxic relationship, Violence, Abortion, Pregnancy, and Gaslighting