ale's reviews
319 reviews

On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft by Stephen King

Go to review page

2.0

This book is a nice and fast read.
I would recommend this to King fans, who may enjoy some context in the author's life, as well an insight into some of his books.
For beginner writers: there are some valuable lessons in there, but nothing you cannot find - or discover for yourself - along the way. Just be cautious, because, as King himself says, something that works for him might not work for you. I've found that the best way to know what works ir by practicing, which is also something King advocated for in this book.
For more advanced writers, this book doesn't add much in terms of techniche. But, like I said, it's a nice and easy read, and got me feeling more inspired afterwards.
I also enjoyed learning more about his writing process, even if I haven't read any of his books lmao. Maybe I'll pick one up soon. 
Nossa Parte de Noite by Mariana Enríquez

Go to review page

5.0

This book was written for ME.
I know it'll not be for everyone. It's very character focused, almost mundane in some aspects, even if, at the same time, it's the opposite of mundane. It was a joy to read. I couldn't stop turning page after page, eager to discover more about this world, more about this mistery, more about these characters. 
The House of the Spirits by Isabel Allende

Go to review page

5.0

This book is something else. She uses every word wisely, and builds a narrative that grips you hard and doesn't let you go. 
Memórias de um Sargento de Milícias by Manuel Antônio de Almeida

Go to review page

2.5

achei um livro bem travado, até mesmo para clássicos, mas depois que comecei a ouvir o audiobook ele parece que se desenvolveu melhor 
The Sign of Four by Arthur Conan Doyle

Go to review page

2.0


Expand filter menu Content Warnings
Elantris by Brandon Sanderson

Go to review page

3.75

this book was a very fast read despite its size, it's very very readable.
it does, however, have its faults.
i know Sanderson wrote this a long time ago and i have seen the improvement he's made in other novels, but i was still bothered by some things:
- the political problems were resolved too easily
- actually, it seemed there was no buildup to a lot of things that happened, that they just came out of nowhere
- the way he writes women and Sarene's pov was making me cringe so much. i understand this books was written in 2005 but oh god
- the dialogues never felt realistic. like the storytelling was great but then they started talking and i went like: "no living being would ever talk like that" and it took me out of the book a bit
- also, i think Sanderson should just avoid writing any type of romance lmao. this is one thing in which he has not improved AT ALL. just let people be single pls
- the ending was the worst part. i could ignore the little plot holes before, but the ending just felt rushed and kinda nonsensical honestly

now what did i like?
- first of, Sanderson's writing is very compelling. it makes you want to keep reading forever. i had a rally hard time putting this book down when i needed to, which is already enough to make me love the book even if i had a lot of problems with it
- the magic systems and worldbuilding were wonderful. i had a great time with it. it was delightful
- i did like the characters, though i think they weren't as fleshed out as they could be

all in all, i had a great time with this book. the ending was what brought it down a little for me. 
A Study in Scarlet by Arthur Conan Doyle

Go to review page

4.5

i had a grudge of sherlock in the little i saw of his midiatic adaptations, but this book changed how i view the character and the story. it was pretty fun.