A review by wmbogart
Conversations with Don DeLillo by

“There’s an element of contempt for meanings. You want to write outside the usual framework. You want to dare readers to make a commitment you know they can’t make. That’s part of it. There’s also the sense of drowning in information and in the mass awareness of things. Everybody seems to know everything. Subjects surface and are totally exhausted in a matter of days or weeks, totally played out by the publishing industry and the broadcast industry. Nothing is too arcane to escape the treatment, the process. Making things difficult for the reader is less an attack on the reader than it is on the age and its facile knowledge-market. The writer is driven by his conviction that some truths aren’t arrived at so easily, that life is still full of mystery, that it might be better for you, Dear Reader, if you went back to the Living section of your newspaper because this is the dying section and you don’t really want to be here.”

Incredibly well-spoken guy, as it turns out. A lot of interesting thoughts and diagnoses here, even if he does fall back on a few recurring talking points from interview to interview.

One key point of clarification. Unfortunately, purchasing this book does not entitle the reader to have their own conversations with Don DeLillo. The book is made up of conversations that have already occurred, between people that are, in all likelihood, not the reader. While it can be fun to project into the interviewer’s portion of the text and make believe that you yourself are having a little conversation with esteemed American novelist Don DeLillo, you are not able to have your own dialogue together in any literal sense. Kinda disappointing.