A review by orionmerlin
Unmasking Autism: Discovering the New Faces of Neurodiversity by Devon Price

4.0

Credibility/Research: 9/10  
The book feels trustworthy, drawing on a well-rounded combination of personal experiences and solid psychological research. Devon Price references studies and interviews extensively, which gave me confidence in their arguments. They also include a broad range of perspectives, ensuring the analysis considers factors like race, gender, and socioeconomic status. I found their approach balanced overall, though I noticed an underlying advocacy tone that felt slightly agenda-driven at times.

Authenticity/Uniqueness: 8/10 
I appreciated how the book brought a fresh angle to the topic by focusing on masking and its implications for autistic individuals. This was an area I hadn’t seen explored in depth in other neurodiversity literature, making the book feel unique. However, there were moments when I felt certain ideas overlapped with existing discussions on autism, which diluted the originality slightly.

Writing: 8/10 
The writing was clear, engaging, and accessible. I found the conversational tone easy to follow and appreciated the lack of technical jargon, which made the content relatable and enjoyable. However, I felt the book occasionally became repetitive, especially when emphasizing societal harms, which disrupted the flow and made certain sections feel slower.

Personal Impact: 9/10 
The book had a significant impact on me. It deepened my understanding of neurodiversity, particularly the concept of masking, and provided actionable insights on self-acceptance. Price’s empathetic exploration of systemic pressures felt transformative and left me with a lasting impression. However, I felt this impact might resonate most with those who see themselves or their loved ones in the experiences described.

Intrigue: 7/10 
The subject matter kept my attention, and the personal stories interwoven with research added depth and relatability. I found the exploration of masking particularly compelling. That said, there were sections where the pacing felt uneven or overly detailed, which caused my engagement to waver at times.

Logic/Informativeness: 8/10
The book felt logical and well-structured, with arguments supported by clear evidence. I found the exploration of systemic biases and the intersections of neurodiversity with other identities particularly informative and thought-provoking. However, some points felt touched upon rather than fully explored, leaving me wishing for greater depth in certain areas.

Enjoyment: 8/10
Overall, I enjoyed the book. The combination of empathy, humor, and insightful commentary made it both informative and emotionally satisfying. However, the slower pacing in some sections and occasional repetition reduced my enjoyment slightly.