Scan barcode
robertwhelan's review against another edition
2.0
Boring to read. Even though it was very short, it still felt too long. Story wasn't bad overall.
jguedes's review against another edition
challenging
dark
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
aoc's review against another edition
3.0
As opposed to more immediate world-ending apocalyptic events I found Greybeard's take on the matter refreshingly laid back. Essentially, current generation of people is set out to be the last one as there are no more children being born. In practical terms this means our protagonist Algernon Timberlane is one of the last few young people by the time story starts in 2030s. And by "young" I mean he is in his fifties and has only childhood memories of what the world was like before "the Accident" in the '80s which altered the world making not only humans incapable of successful procreation, but also many mammals in generals with few exceptions. While the novel explains what happened through flashbacks and recollections, which are spoilers so I won't go into them, I can safely say the causes that lead to this slowly dying world don't really matter because the story isn't about them or trying to fix the impossible. World is what it is leaving Algy and his wife Martha to find their way as years inexorably go on.
Structure we're working here is alternating chapters - present day followed by flashback at various points in time. I particularly liked the one set after things really started falling apart in England so military steps in to assume control. Makes you realize this entire story could've taken a drastically different direction then and there. Amusing bit for me was how a pivotal chapter explaining Algy's reasoning as to why he initially joins DOUCH(E), organization meant to safeguard humanity's future... in a way, fell completely flat. Additional points as the man himself confirms that very thing towards the end of the book. But lest I type things randomly those are the parts meant to flesh out the world-that-was. If you ask me the body of work are present-day chapters dealing with how our little group survives. You never get the impression it's some epic adventure or anything, but rather senior citizens who still have to contend with circumstances beyond their control and other people being idiots as effective post-apocalypse brings the worst out of them. You're on the run with nowhere to go? Come across a secluded makeshift village and stay there for almost fifteen years, why not. Rich descriptions of this new existence go a long way to successfully selling it, though. By god, I believed they were sailing down Thames for most of the book and bustling wildlife coming to reclaim its rightful place as few holdouts of decrepit humanity start becoming more out there with age.
We come to my problem with Brian Aldiss that I keep complaining about despite reading his books anyway. He cannot write characters conversing with one another without coming off as incredibly stilted or expository. I think Greybeard suffers from it in particular because all those scenes between Martha and Algy when they talk about what childhood memories spurred the latter to become the man he is now or what the former feels she's missing as there are no children in the world all sound very dry as presented. Then again that particular type of rapport is Aldiss' preferred. Even with other characters like their religious friend Charles or certain cult leader they come across, for example. Everyone is uttering dialog relevant to their personality, but final result is lack of character itself.
Impression I could not shake while reading Greybeard was one of meandering series of pit-stops along the road to nowhere as there's no clear-cut objective. Novel also pulls the rug from under you in the last fifteen pages or so by revealing the great mystery that has been continually skirted along. You can probably guess what it is, but the abrupt manner in which it's handled just did not sit well with me.
Structure we're working here is alternating chapters - present day followed by flashback at various points in time. I particularly liked the one set after things really started falling apart in England so military steps in to assume control. Makes you realize this entire story could've taken a drastically different direction then and there. Amusing bit for me was how a pivotal chapter explaining Algy's reasoning as to why he initially joins DOUCH(E), organization meant to safeguard humanity's future... in a way, fell completely flat. Additional points as the man himself confirms that very thing towards the end of the book. But lest I type things randomly those are the parts meant to flesh out the world-that-was. If you ask me the body of work are present-day chapters dealing with how our little group survives. You never get the impression it's some epic adventure or anything, but rather senior citizens who still have to contend with circumstances beyond their control and other people being idiots as effective post-apocalypse brings the worst out of them. You're on the run with nowhere to go? Come across a secluded makeshift village and stay there for almost fifteen years, why not. Rich descriptions of this new existence go a long way to successfully selling it, though. By god, I believed they were sailing down Thames for most of the book and bustling wildlife coming to reclaim its rightful place as few holdouts of decrepit humanity start becoming more out there with age.
We come to my problem with Brian Aldiss that I keep complaining about despite reading his books anyway. He cannot write characters conversing with one another without coming off as incredibly stilted or expository. I think Greybeard suffers from it in particular because all those scenes between Martha and Algy when they talk about what childhood memories spurred the latter to become the man he is now or what the former feels she's missing as there are no children in the world all sound very dry as presented. Then again that particular type of rapport is Aldiss' preferred. Even with other characters like their religious friend Charles or certain cult leader they come across, for example. Everyone is uttering dialog relevant to their personality, but final result is lack of character itself.
Impression I could not shake while reading Greybeard was one of meandering series of pit-stops along the road to nowhere as there's no clear-cut objective. Novel also pulls the rug from under you in the last fifteen pages or so by revealing the great mystery that has been continually skirted along. You can probably guess what it is, but the abrupt manner in which it's handled just did not sit well with me.
bigenk's review against another edition
dark
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
2.0
Greybeard follows the geriatric remains of the human species after a radiation-based 'accident' has made them infertile. Greybeard and wife journey through the English countryside, from dilapidated village to flooded farmland, while reflecting on the series of events that brought them to this moment. It's a short read, but not necessarily a quick one. Aldiss writes in a formal/traditional manner which makes most of his prose elongated and circuitous. In Greybeard, Aldiss struggles to maintain consistency in writing quality. Some passages were glimpses into his power and eloquence, but these were few and far between.
Perhaps part of of this was due to consistently having what were essential flashback chapters in which the events leading up to the present are examined. This had the effect of stopping any flow or pace that Aldiss tried to create in the main plot line. These flashbacks were also where Aldiss struggled to write the most. One chapter in particular, the flashback to Greybeard's time in Washington where he was being recruited by the unfortunately named "DOUCH", was especially terrible. It felt like it was written by someone completely different. The prose was pulp level, there is glaring objectification and diminishment of women, and a tone that felt more in line with a 30's crime novel. Yes, this was only one chapter, but it colored my opinion of the rest of the work so much because of how bad it was.
I did enjoy the melancholic and introspective tone of the novel, as the characters struggle to find meaning and purpose as they watch society and structure crumble around them. What is the purpose of life if not to pass our genetics on to the next generation? There's a certain level of cultural psychosis that Greybeard see around him as people become delusional about their circumstances as a coping mechanism. I don't think that Aldiss dove as deeply as he could and perhaps should have on these themes. Too much time is spent on characters and plot threads that feel more like sketches than fully formed elements. It's also undermined by an ending that not only feels rushed/sudden, but has an entirely different (hopeful) perspective on the potential future of humanity.
Ultimately, Greybeard just didn't come together for me. It was an entirely forgettable, boring and unremarkable book. Which is a shame, because I'm sure that the skeleton itself could be the framework for something much better.
Perhaps part of of this was due to consistently having what were essential flashback chapters in which the events leading up to the present are examined. This had the effect of stopping any flow or pace that Aldiss tried to create in the main plot line. These flashbacks were also where Aldiss struggled to write the most. One chapter in particular, the flashback to Greybeard's time in Washington where he was being recruited by the unfortunately named "DOUCH", was especially terrible. It felt like it was written by someone completely different. The prose was pulp level, there is glaring objectification and diminishment of women, and a tone that felt more in line with a 30's crime novel. Yes, this was only one chapter, but it colored my opinion of the rest of the work so much because of how bad it was.
I did enjoy the melancholic and introspective tone of the novel, as the characters struggle to find meaning and purpose as they watch society and structure crumble around them. What is the purpose of life if not to pass our genetics on to the next generation? There's a certain level of cultural psychosis that Greybeard see around him as people become delusional about their circumstances as a coping mechanism. I don't think that Aldiss dove as deeply as he could and perhaps should have on these themes. Too much time is spent on characters and plot threads that feel more like sketches than fully formed elements. It's also undermined by an ending that not only feels rushed/sudden, but has an entirely different (hopeful) perspective on the potential future of humanity.
Ultimately, Greybeard just didn't come together for me. It was an entirely forgettable, boring and unremarkable book. Which is a shame, because I'm sure that the skeleton itself could be the framework for something much better.
tbrooks96's review against another edition
dark
emotional
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.5
dyfanlewis's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
emotional
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
4.0
david_harold_nicholson's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
mysterious
reflective
sad
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
the_prickly_reader's review against another edition
adventurous
emotional
hopeful
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
misanthrope's review against another edition
adventurous
dark
hopeful
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated
3.0
Excellent writing. A story with good ideas. I would read more from this offer.