Scan barcode
poisonenvy's review against another edition
3.0
Julie d'Aubigny was a real swordswoman in the late 17th century, a famous opera singer, who'd kiss the girls and duel the boys, and I selected this book for my book club because man, what a badass (and also because we had gushed about her once and so I looked up any historical fictional accounts on her life).
The book, overall, wound up being satisfactory, though it fell a little flat for me. The framing device - Julie confessing her sins on her death bed - was well done and I really quite liked that. The third person prose sections lost something for me in the writing style, whether it was because of the constant POV switches or just because I don't love third-person present tense. The present tense could have been effective in making the scenes seem like a shift to Julia reflecting on her life, a kind of 'life is flashing before my eyes' kind of thing, except for the fact that it was told from so many different POVs that the effect was greatly diminished; it can't be Julia's life flashing before her eyes if I'm getting it from the perspective of some random, nameless dude in a bar, or if she's not in the scenes at all. The apparent emphasis on aesthetic morality (the belief that beauty equates to goodness) also left a bad taste in my mouth.
There were a lot of excellent moments that made me laugh or cheer for Julia, and I'm glad I read this book. There's one particularly beautiful scene where Julia watches La Monja Alferez, a play about Catalina, which I found especially poignant. I'll certainly be checking out some of the non-fiction reads that Gardiner listed at the back of her novel. Would I recommend the book? Probably not, unless Julie d'Aubigny happens to pop up naturally in conversation, however.
The book, overall, wound up being satisfactory, though it fell a little flat for me. The framing device - Julie confessing her sins on her death bed - was well done and I really quite liked that. The third person prose sections lost something for me in the writing style, whether it was because of the constant POV switches or just because I don't love third-person present tense. The present tense could have been effective in making the scenes seem like a shift to Julia reflecting on her life, a kind of 'life is flashing before my eyes' kind of thing, except for the fact that it was told from so many different POVs that the effect was greatly diminished; it can't be Julia's life flashing before her eyes if I'm getting it from the perspective of some random, nameless dude in a bar, or if she's not in the scenes at all. The apparent emphasis on aesthetic morality (the belief that beauty equates to goodness) also left a bad taste in my mouth.
There were a lot of excellent moments that made me laugh or cheer for Julia, and I'm glad I read this book. There's one particularly beautiful scene where Julia watches La Monja Alferez, a play about Catalina, which I found especially poignant. I'll certainly be checking out some of the non-fiction reads that Gardiner listed at the back of her novel. Would I recommend the book? Probably not, unless Julie d'Aubigny happens to pop up naturally in conversation, however.
plumeriade's review against another edition
2.0
i love the subject of julie d'aubigny. but this book's prose was a struggle to read. lots of short, choppy fragments in some chapters (third-person ones) offset by rambling in others (first-person ones).
caropero's review
way too slow. would have been more enjoyable if the first person chapters when she talks to priest were shorter
cassielaj's review against another edition
As much as I wanted to enjoy this, it did not hold my attention and I finally ended up giving up. Parts were engaging, while parts were dull and dragged on. The story is being told rather than illustrated, and the writing is quite dull at times.
librarycatnip's review against another edition
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
3.75
Unexpectedly, it's just not grabbing me. I usually love memoir/diary style books but I'm just not interested.
eion's review against another edition
reflective
sad
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
3.0
reading_mermaid's review against another edition
3.0
I really wanted to love this book soso much. The subject material is exciting and fascinating and you can see the author actively weaving her best to bring it to life. But ultimately it didn't grip me the way I hope, and it always felt like the passages of Julie rambling to the boring priest were so much longer than the actual flashbacks into her life.
kitnotmarlowe's review against another edition
adventurous
emotional
funny
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
i've been fascinated with julie d'aubigny for a long, long time. she's one of those flamboyant, larger-than-life figures who feels like she could only exist in storybooks and yet did exist, loved and was loved by real people! her story, as gardiner tells it, is excessive and swashbuckling, filled with vanity and glory. from the author's note it's clear that julie means a lot to gardiner, and she reconstructs some difficult history near-flawlessly and with a lot of affection for her subject.
the structure is clever and Very fun! initially i was captivated by the writing style, but it soured on me the more i read. the monologues and flashbacks alternated between almost overwrought and too sparse which left me feeling unfulfilled. all in all, i enjoyed GODDESS and i love julie "bad gay representation" d'aubigny
the structure is clever and Very fun! initially i was captivated by the writing style, but it soured on me the more i read. the monologues and flashbacks alternated between almost overwrought and too sparse which left me feeling unfulfilled. all in all, i enjoyed GODDESS and i love julie "bad gay representation" d'aubigny
flowerpotbooks's review against another edition
2.0
For me this is a great story that was told poorly. Long first person sections were repetitive and annoying. When I got to the end of the book, I still didn't feel like I knew the character, only the main events of her life, and half the book was a "confessional" to a priest! I never felt true love, passion, regret, motivation etc from Julie. The third person sections were too short and non-descriptive. I really wanted to love this book because she led a fascinating life.