Take a photo of a barcode or cover
mrfroggy's review
4.0
Really great perspectives on different ways of disabling architecture outside of just accessibility! Though there are a few nods toward other intersectional experiences of architecture, i thought this was def very academically sheltered and not that radical in its call for new ideas and structural change. I get that theres is scope to consider and the constraints of being an academic in the outcome of this work, but i thought this couldve benefitted from a deeper breakdown of structural ableism and saneism in the kinds of experiences that are represented in built environments.
Overall a really great overview of potential new theories/work in form, tectonics, and preservation, but since it's just an overview of suggestions, not as detailed as i wouldve liked and also i just thought it toed too closely to the line of respectability and liberal academia
Overall a really great overview of potential new theories/work in form, tectonics, and preservation, but since it's just an overview of suggestions, not as detailed as i wouldve liked and also i just thought it toed too closely to the line of respectability and liberal academia
mrolph's review against another edition
All my holds came in at the same time. I also want to give this book more time as it is heavy with theory.
nilescrane's review against another edition
4.0
Well researched and interesting. Not the most accessible when it comes to academic literature, though I have minimal architectural knowledge, so realistically that's a me-problem.