Scan barcode
lucy_goosey7's review against another edition
4.0
A beautiful story unravelling the world from a boy's point of view - the city is the scary, sprawling chaos where you're easily lost
batcountry101's review against another edition
4.0
Well, this book took an eternity. Partially, it was due to the complexity of the writing, but mainly it was because of my new job. The book follows an 8 year old child who is a Jewish immigrant living in the Lower Eastside of New York City sometime prior to 1930. The author brings distinctly modernist influences to bear on the tale. The story stresses the multilingual and multicultural aspects of the child's life and surroundings. I can't say that I truly enjoyed the book, but I was thoroughly challenged at times (which is sometimes enjoyable in a of itself). I give it 4 stars because of the ingenuity of the writing, and the complexity of what would otherwise simple story.
baronessvonrex's review against another edition
3.0
Loved the nod to Joyce, though upon finishing, for some reason, I couldn't wholeheartedly recommend this book to just anyone.
outspokenlibrarian's review against another edition
3.0
An "immigrant" novel, about a Jewish family living in turn-of-the-twentieth-century New York, told through the eyes and consciousness of a small boy named David. The sights, sounds, smells, of the time all captured here, right down to the dialects of various New York denizens. Sometimes it gets a little convoluted, but overall I enjoyed it and am curious what the author's other work, published more than sixty years later, is like.
lee_foust's review against another edition
5.0
So the hype on this American classic novel is all about the immigrant experience, Ellis Island, the lower East side of New York City at the turn of the century. But I found all of these elements mere setting and felt that they have little to do with what makes this a really great novel. To me, this is first and foremost a novel from the point of view of a just pre-pubescent child, already torn apart by the performative aspects of gender difference--that is to say his father's manly violence and his mother's overweening female protectiveness--resisting his introduction into the biological reality behind gender roles--genitalia itself and sex acts--that his slightly older peers would force upon him.
The drama is both psychic and physical as the child voyeristically observes his parents and their roles as male and female (and also overhears his mother recounting an illicit love affair of hers preceding her marriage), and is pressured by a slightly older girl into petting, and, climatically, into assisting a male friend in the seduction of a cousin. The conflict lies in the child's resistance to confronting the genitalia and acts supposedly behind the gender roles that seem, to him, so charged with violence and danger--to both the over-aggressive male and the seemingly passive female, who could at any moment become a victim, shamed and dishonored by her own sexual desire.
This is, to me, a fascinating story because it illuminated the pity I feel for the political conservative and their pitiful desire to constantly police the performative aspects of gender. Conservatives have always clung to gender norms, clothing, restroom segregation, hairstyles, and, of course, traditional patriarchal power and workplace norms that keep men in control. These are obvious aspects of traditional culture to which we'd expect the religious and conservative to adhere. What's so pitiful about it, is their reluctance, because of taboo, to confront the only place where gender is real and "biological" as they always say, when we are naked and in sexual acts. Thus the poor conservative seeks to police the theater surrounding gender without ever referring to the biological fact of gender that they claim they support since, because of taboo, for them it cannot actual exist and always remains just outside of what can be seen or even spoken of in their world.
The struggle to understand gender roles without confronting genitals or sexuality is real, and a constant conservative bugaboo, and this novel does a fabulous job of representing these forces at work in a child's mind. What also makes it a great novel, is how the form reiterates the conflict. While the narrative begins in a kind of classic realist style, the prose gets more and more impressionistic, and even experimental the more pitched the struggle within the child's mind grows. This is a really fabulous technique, perfectly aesthetically pleasing as the prose mirrors the drama and draws us further into the inner struggle and outer actions.
Like all struggles with this kind of culture over taboo in the conservative mind, the drama eventually leads to mere chastity (as in the Catholic church), or an act of self mutilation (see: St. Origen and other related stories), or some other gesture in death's direction in an attempt to erase the realities of human breeding, like a concentration camps or a murder spree scapegoating women. While leftist politics, through revolution, have provoked a fair amount of death, I think that the conservative side, fascism, can only be a kind of death cult since it can never admit to the basic biological facts of human genitalia or the act of procreation, so caught up as it is in upholding the power structures and ritualistic theatrics of the past.
The drama is both psychic and physical as the child voyeristically observes his parents and their roles as male and female (and also overhears his mother recounting an illicit love affair of hers preceding her marriage), and is pressured by a slightly older girl into petting, and, climatically, into assisting a male friend in the seduction of a cousin. The conflict lies in the child's resistance to confronting the genitalia and acts supposedly behind the gender roles that seem, to him, so charged with violence and danger--to both the over-aggressive male and the seemingly passive female, who could at any moment become a victim, shamed and dishonored by her own sexual desire.
This is, to me, a fascinating story because it illuminated the pity I feel for the political conservative and their pitiful desire to constantly police the performative aspects of gender. Conservatives have always clung to gender norms, clothing, restroom segregation, hairstyles, and, of course, traditional patriarchal power and workplace norms that keep men in control. These are obvious aspects of traditional culture to which we'd expect the religious and conservative to adhere. What's so pitiful about it, is their reluctance, because of taboo, to confront the only place where gender is real and "biological" as they always say, when we are naked and in sexual acts. Thus the poor conservative seeks to police the theater surrounding gender without ever referring to the biological fact of gender that they claim they support since, because of taboo, for them it cannot actual exist and always remains just outside of what can be seen or even spoken of in their world.
The struggle to understand gender roles without confronting genitals or sexuality is real, and a constant conservative bugaboo, and this novel does a fabulous job of representing these forces at work in a child's mind. What also makes it a great novel, is how the form reiterates the conflict. While the narrative begins in a kind of classic realist style, the prose gets more and more impressionistic, and even experimental the more pitched the struggle within the child's mind grows. This is a really fabulous technique, perfectly aesthetically pleasing as the prose mirrors the drama and draws us further into the inner struggle and outer actions.
Like all struggles with this kind of culture over taboo in the conservative mind, the drama eventually leads to mere chastity (as in the Catholic church), or an act of self mutilation (see: St. Origen and other related stories), or some other gesture in death's direction in an attempt to erase the realities of human breeding, like a concentration camps or a murder spree scapegoating women. While leftist politics, through revolution, have provoked a fair amount of death, I think that the conservative side, fascism, can only be a kind of death cult since it can never admit to the basic biological facts of human genitalia or the act of procreation, so caught up as it is in upholding the power structures and ritualistic theatrics of the past.
nancypaul's review against another edition
3.0
It's hard for me to judge a work nearly 80 years old against current literary standards, although I suppose any good work stands the test of time. I did love this book in some respects, and grow frustrated with it for the same reasons. Stream of consciousness of a small boy, done so convincingly, eventually wore on me, and by the end I was skimming, something I almost never do. But I did revel in the setting, the situation of the family, crazy sister Bertha, etc.
stjernesvarme's review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
n0rain's review against another edition
5.0
I'll be honest, it took me six months to finish this book, not because I didn't love it, but because it was so beautifully and densely written that I needed to clear emotional time and space to actually sit down and give this book the undivided attention that it so deserves! From the very beginning of this novel, imagery is everything. Normally, I wouldn't want to read a book that takes three pages just to tell you it's raining, but this book is less of a high-speed chase from plot point to point, and more of a Sunday drive through some of the most beautiful language I have ever encountered in a novel. Things I specifically loved about it were how the characters were so rich and diverse in their mannerisms and traits, as well as Roth's elevation of the Yiddish dialect versus the harshness of when the characters were speaking English. Although the entire novel is prose, much of it is extremely poetic. By the time I was about 3/4 of the way done with it, I had given up hope that there was an actual plot and had come to terms with the idea that this was one of those more "true to life," kinds of books that was more about just making the reader feel something. But then! Some small details from the very beginning, like the first 20 pages, made their way back into the end, several hundred pages later. Boom! It all came together, and every single word was beautiful.
geller's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
5.0
An utter masterpiece. Not only did this book bring me closer to the immigrant experience of my great-grandparents, but the writing is on another level...I felt David's perceptions wash over me like I was actually seeing the world through his eyes. The horrifying lows and ecstatic highs of his coming of age bleed through the pages. It's a long, winding journey, but well worth the ride.
Graphic: Child abuse
Moderate: Sexual assault
Minor: Racism and Antisemitism