Scan barcode
highkingeliot's review against another edition
5.0
if this is an autobiography then i still know nothing about the details of vonneguts life but i know more than id like to about how he felt about it
ampleyd's review against another edition
dark
funny
lighthearted
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
2.75
big_cat's review against another edition
dark
funny
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
Graphic: Ableism and Sexual content
thekestrel's review against another edition
challenging
dark
reflective
fast-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
Graphic: Addiction, Drug abuse, and Incest
Moderate: Animal death, Confinement, Domestic abuse, Forced institutionalization, and Abandonment
Minor: Pedophilia, Rape, Sexual violence, Slavery, and Pregnancy
novelnotions's review against another edition
2.0
There were some unique takes that made me chuckle at various points, but I struggled to really get invested in this new vision of the future.
conner_h's review against another edition
3.0
I think this is one of the saddest books I’ve ever read. Vonnegut wrote it shortly following the death of his sister. The main characters are two siblings who have a psychic connection and become half of a person when the other is absent. Vonnegut called this work autobiographical and the pain of losing his sister becomes raw and palpable when expressed through these characters. Having a sister myself, this book has had a strange resonance and I think about it a lot, despite not particularly enjoying it.
Vonnegut pinpoints the loneliness of being an American to the absence of extended families. Our consumer economy encourages us to live in small nuclear families and take up neolocal residence, which leaves no web of support to help cope if your family members die before you. Isolation is the inevitable result; our society is equipped with no solutions.
Science and modernization are not seen as agents of “progress” but as a de-evolution and the cause of widespread cultural isolation. Science is personified by the Chinese, who become Earth’s dominant society by physically miniaturizing themselves while America experiences apocalypse.
The Absurdism in Slapstick didn’t strike me as playful so much as nihilistic, a reaction to a world so cruel that it can’t be understood or improved by the imposition of rational systems.
In contrast with what the title leads one to expect, the humor is very dark, at points being imperceptible. The conclusions are bleak; we have gone too far down the wrong path, and not science nor religion can correct us. Vonnegut was always a pessimist, but his other books often searched for a punchline to the horrors wrought by humanity. In Slapstick, humanity itself is the punchline, laughed at by a jeering god.
Vonnegut pinpoints the loneliness of being an American to the absence of extended families. Our consumer economy encourages us to live in small nuclear families and take up neolocal residence, which leaves no web of support to help cope if your family members die before you. Isolation is the inevitable result; our society is equipped with no solutions.
Science and modernization are not seen as agents of “progress” but as a de-evolution and the cause of widespread cultural isolation. Science is personified by the Chinese, who become Earth’s dominant society by physically miniaturizing themselves while America experiences apocalypse.
The Absurdism in Slapstick didn’t strike me as playful so much as nihilistic, a reaction to a world so cruel that it can’t be understood or improved by the imposition of rational systems.
In contrast with what the title leads one to expect, the humor is very dark, at points being imperceptible. The conclusions are bleak; we have gone too far down the wrong path, and not science nor religion can correct us. Vonnegut was always a pessimist, but his other books often searched for a punchline to the horrors wrought by humanity. In Slapstick, humanity itself is the punchline, laughed at by a jeering god.
jentastic76's review against another edition
4.0
This is not my favorite Vonnegut but it's still amazing. Cat's Cradle or Slaughterhouse Five are the ones to read if you haven't read him before. But if you've read the others and are looking for something new, this is great. I think I liked the prologue written by Vonnegut better than the actual book. He really was an amazing writer.
paige_pell's review against another edition
3.0
Maybe this one will grow on me over time. Right now it just feels jumbled and I'm not sure what to make of it.
cestsibon's review against another edition
3.0
not my favorite vonnegut i’ve read but this was still solid and truly a timeless piece of classic especially in regard to its message that even though history repeats itself and continuously tells us the same things and sends us the same warnings, we refuse to take the cultural blinders off and thus as he states “history is merely a list of surprises … it can only prepare us to be surprised yet again.”
hi ho.
hi ho.