Scan barcode
michaelontheplanet's review against another edition
3.0
Beating time: I’m not sure what VS Naipaul went through in childhood but thrashings probably were a big feature, and he seems to have rather enjoyed them if A House For Mr Biswas is anything to go by. It’s not a modern book in any sense - husbands hit wives, wives hit children, the eternal order goes on - but there’s a certain charm to this lengthy family saga and story of the struggle of Mohun Biswas, a little man ground down by life’s struggle whose rebellions are small but crucial. He may not achieve much but proves he is alive by trying, and when he achieves his goal does not live long to enjoy it. Along the way there’s plenty of small adventure and the humdrum of the everyday conveyed so that its banality is captured without becoming tedious. Naipaul’s first success and his most significant novel (it says here) - for outsiders and spanking enthusiasts everywhere.
drcwright's review against another edition
1.0
I tried but I tired. A book needs a good story or great writing. Ideally both. This has neither.
I struggled to 60%, then decided not to punish myself any further.
DNF.
I struggled to 60%, then decided not to punish myself any further.
DNF.
rickburner's review against another edition
5.0
Throughout his adult life, Mr. Biswas comforts himself by reading the Stoics. Naturally, he is completely lacking in Stoic virtue - he's petulant, ineffectual, easily led, and in his worst moments, pettily violent. He's a man whose dreams and ideals come to shambolic fruition at best, but usually not at all.
This book is billed as a tragic comedy, but Naipaul's ruthless pen results in something that feels neither. Mr. Biswas is not a hero felled by fate; he never rose in stature. And there is insufficient irony and lightheartedness to leaven the pains on display. It is nothing less than a human life in its entirety, in all of its foibles, idiocies, boredom, chance, and humble sadnesses and triumphs. It is at times challenging to read, not because Naipaul's prose fails, but because he refuses to bend the course of Mr. Biswas's life to our taste and expectations.
By the end - by Mr. Biswas's funeral - one has an intimacy and retrospective clarity usually reserved for the funerals of one's own relatives. And counterposed to that finality, also the same sense of possibility, of a life and world bequeathed to those who remain.
This book is billed as a tragic comedy, but Naipaul's ruthless pen results in something that feels neither. Mr. Biswas is not a hero felled by fate; he never rose in stature. And there is insufficient irony and lightheartedness to leaven the pains on display. It is nothing less than a human life in its entirety, in all of its foibles, idiocies, boredom, chance, and humble sadnesses and triumphs. It is at times challenging to read, not because Naipaul's prose fails, but because he refuses to bend the course of Mr. Biswas's life to our taste and expectations.
By the end - by Mr. Biswas's funeral - one has an intimacy and retrospective clarity usually reserved for the funerals of one's own relatives. And counterposed to that finality, also the same sense of possibility, of a life and world bequeathed to those who remain.
jpegben's review against another edition
4.75
His freedom was over, and it had been false. The past could not be ignored; it was never counterfeit; he carried it within himself. If there was a place for him, it was one that had already been hallowed out by time, by everything he had lived through, however imperfect, makeshift and cheating.
I'll keep this short and sharp, but having read Biswas once already, it lived up to it's billing a second time and some. Mr Biswas might be oft-times pathetic, surly, conniving, and acerbic, but he's a roguish, deeply sympathetic picaresque hero. His attempts at self-actualisation, of finding meaning and security in a world in which he is "unnecessary and unaccomodated", is at times painful to read. Biswas is a book about the difficulties of social mobility, of the fraught nature of family life, about the constant pressures and expectations of society. Naipaul writes brilliantly about anxiety, depression, loneliness, and melancholia. He understands, like Tolstoy, that stress comes in a thousand forms, in infinite variations, that it is experienced entirely subjectively and cripples each individual in a unique way. Mr Biswas' Sisyphean struggles are brutal. They're extreme. He stares the void in the face. But they're also relatable on some level. The sheer absurdity of the Tulsi family, which seems to operate like a repellent social organism, could stand in for so many things, but we've all known something like it at some point.
Yet, Biswas as a book, is so funny. It makes you laugh out loud. The tragicomedy of Mr Biswas' plight is in the very best of the satiric tradition. Naipaul's stylistic mastery is well-known, but it's difficult to overstate how much you can feel it in this book. His prose is cutting, but also deeply humane. The dialogue, the characterisation, the palm trees, the humidity, the sun-bleached signs and road side kiosks, bring Trinidad alive. In Mr Biswas, in Anand, even in Shama and Savi, we feel Naipaul's own biography. This is a deeply personal book with profoundly universal characteristics. The sort of book which resonates across time, place, and culture.
I'll read this again and again after that and probably again after that; it's that good.
lostcupofstars's review against another edition
1.0
I finished this by force bc it’s a ‘classic’ and I wanted to be able to pass my own judgement.
There were a few interesting anecdotes dotted around but really it’s boring and has no business being this long.
There were a few interesting anecdotes dotted around but really it’s boring and has no business being this long.
madelynskies's review against another edition
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? N/A
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
shaniceh's review against another edition
4.0
I see why he won a Nobel Prize but I also see why no one ever finishes this book.
lacunalibrarian's review against another edition
challenging
dark
emotional
funny
sad
tense
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
laylabrook4's review against another edition
reflective
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
carey_anne's review against another edition
3.0
Good & boring at the same time. It was interesting reading about the life of Mr. Biswas, but I feel like the story could have been told in 500 pages rather than 1000.