Scan barcode
brentmpage's review against another edition
3.0
I’ve always wanted to read Dubliners, but it was more of a mixed bag than I thought it would be.
nnw's review against another edition
4.0
great stories, was def missing a good amount of context for some of them (i know very little about irish history), but felt very cohesive as you moved between stories, which was v cool
louiequartorze67's review against another edition
4.0
It was an enjoyable read for me. Some of the stories spoke to me in a heartfelt way. Others, not so much.
summerzinger's review against another edition
2.0
2.5 stars
James Joyce's Dubliners is a collection of Irish short stories written at the beginning of the 1900s. The stories are not connected, but are all set in Dublin and share a similar pattern of each one ending with a moment of realisation or epiphany. At first the endings felt quite abrupt to me, but once I realised what Joyce was up to I found it an intriguing concept.
In general, I don't like short stories. Each one feels like starting a new book and having to get used to new characters each time. Then just as you're getting used to them the story ends. Because of this, I just simply didn't engage with some of the stories. The only one that had some real meat on its bones was The Dead, and that was probably just due to its sheer length.
I'm never going to pretend I like a classic just because it's a classic. I have no doubt Joyce is a great writer (and this did come through on many occasions), but I'm not sure if the short story was the best place for him to shine. Sometimes I was bored. Sometimes I was amazed at a turn of phrase. A mixed bag.
James Joyce's Dubliners is a collection of Irish short stories written at the beginning of the 1900s. The stories are not connected, but are all set in Dublin and share a similar pattern of each one ending with a moment of realisation or epiphany. At first the endings felt quite abrupt to me, but once I realised what Joyce was up to I found it an intriguing concept.
In general, I don't like short stories. Each one feels like starting a new book and having to get used to new characters each time. Then just as you're getting used to them the story ends. Because of this, I just simply didn't engage with some of the stories. The only one that had some real meat on its bones was The Dead, and that was probably just due to its sheer length.
I'm never going to pretend I like a classic just because it's a classic. I have no doubt Joyce is a great writer (and this did come through on many occasions), but I'm not sure if the short story was the best place for him to shine. Sometimes I was bored. Sometimes I was amazed at a turn of phrase. A mixed bag.
temi_m's review against another edition
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.0
veerle's review against another edition
dark
reflective
sad
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? N/A
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
5.0
If you want to feel what Dublin was like in Joyce's time, then this book is for you. 15 sketches of people, usually bleak and dark, just as I like it. Joyce paints little portraits of people who are stuck in life in one way on another. He is great in adding tiny little details that contribute to the general atmosphere and the realistic portrait of Irish society.
Politics and religion are present in the background: Irish nationalism and the discussion about it (a story about Parnell), the British... The stories follow life: the first ones are told by children, then there are stories about marriage, making a career, failed dreams...
My favourite was Eveline, about a woman who is about to escape her life but can't in the end.
Politics and religion are present in the background: Irish nationalism and the discussion about it (a story about Parnell), the British... The stories follow life: the first ones are told by children, then there are stories about marriage, making a career, failed dreams...
My favourite was Eveline, about a woman who is about to escape her life but can't in the end.
deborahisreading's review against another edition
3.0
I have mixed feelings about this one. I loved the last story in the book. But the rest felt half done, introducing characters that dwindled off the page. I wanted and expected more.
pawact's review against another edition
4.0
This is in the pantheon of great short story collections for a reason. There is tremendous depth and insight in these stories that mostly take up only a minute part of their characters lives. And it is easily the most digestible Joyce you are going to find. This is the book that Joyce decides to play by the rules and still manages to outpace everyone around him. The Dead is one of the greatest short stories written in the English language. Highly recommended.
chrissie_whitley's review against another edition
4.0
Dubliners by James Joyce, first published in 1914, is a collection of fifteen short stories that quietly and powerfully captures everyday Irish life during a pivotal time in Ireland's search for its own identity. Each story centers on characters experiencing 'epiphanies' that offer the narrative a thoughtful arc — a subtle tilt toward resolution, which can be unusual in short stories. Joyce's characters are softly displayed and gently handled as he turns them over, examining them from all sides. The standout story, The Dead, is the final entry in the collection — a novella and, by far, my favorite.
What I love about Dubliners, along with its quiet, meditative storytelling (and the brilliant audiobook performances), is imagining the through line from Joyce to a contemporary Irish author like Claire Keegan. While Joyce captured early 20th-century struggles with a focus on social constraints and masculine sensibilities — even with his female characters — Keegan offers a modern view with more natural nuance. Her work balances both male and female perspectives, filling in the feminine sensibilities that Joyce wasn't able to fully access. She portrays resilience and stoicism through a lens attuned to present-day values, creating a more cohesive portrait of existence. Irish storytelling is layered and rich with knowable characters, people you can see and feel. These two authors, separated by a century, are bookends of Irish literature that each reflect evolving cultural values and literary focuses, giving us a compelling, continuous portrait of Irish life and identity.
What I love about Dubliners, along with its quiet, meditative storytelling (and the brilliant audiobook performances), is imagining the through line from Joyce to a contemporary Irish author like Claire Keegan. While Joyce captured early 20th-century struggles with a focus on social constraints and masculine sensibilities — even with his female characters — Keegan offers a modern view with more natural nuance. Her work balances both male and female perspectives, filling in the feminine sensibilities that Joyce wasn't able to fully access. She portrays resilience and stoicism through a lens attuned to present-day values, creating a more cohesive portrait of existence. Irish storytelling is layered and rich with knowable characters, people you can see and feel. These two authors, separated by a century, are bookends of Irish literature that each reflect evolving cultural values and literary focuses, giving us a compelling, continuous portrait of Irish life and identity.
s_yodes's review against another edition
3.0
Meh. Much more interesting considering which “types” are left out of this book. Were they beyond Joyce’s notice, comprehension, imagination?