Take a photo of a barcode or cover
kroudebu85's review against another edition
2.0
My first Faulkner. The language and the pace kept me from finishing it. :( Will try another Faulkner another day.
remarkieable's review against another edition
2.0
I read this book while traveling in Mississippi and visiting Rowan Oak, a fulfilling experience. I felt like this story was an interesting depiction of one family, the Sartoris clan, and particularly one boy, Bayard's, experience during and after the Civil War. I hadn't considered the impact of the loss of the war on the southern psyche in quite this way before. But overall, I found this narrative less engaging than As I Lay Dying and The Sound and The Fury.
bcohen13's review against another edition
4.0
Great prequel to ‘Sartoris’, and Faulkner’s writing is remarkable as always. He tells a story without telling it, just letting it unfold through the words and thoughts of the characters. The reader has to catch up, but you usually do. Guess I’m giving it a four because it’s challenging, and as it takes place at the end of the Civil War, there are LOTS of n-words.
jay_the_hippie's review against another edition
4.0
I find some of William Faulkner's books tough to read, but not this one. It included a lot of dramatic scenes with strong images, including death, bravery, and even some really funny parts. (Maybe I haven't read the right books yet, but I don't tend to think of humor and Faulkner being together much.) It was interesting to read about a Southern man's view of the end of the Civil War.
modestothemouse's review against another edition
4.0
Not quite as powerful as [b:Go Down, Moses|17726|Go Down, Moses|William Faulkner|http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1166853330s/17726.jpg|912670], but still a great read. Faulkner once again subverts Southern conventions and genres and gives a complicated view of a family during the Civil War. It was great to read this story now, after reading some other books where the Sartoris family plays minor roles, and finally get their story from Bayard. My favorite character was Ringo. He was smart, tough and he could draw. One of my favorite lines in the book is "I saw Ringo, in the air, looking exactly like a frog, even to his eyes, with his mouth open too and his open pocket knife in his hand." I really like the narrative and the way Bayard delivered the story. I feel like Faulkner may have used Bayard to play around with tense. I would recommend this to anyone interested in Faulkner, since it's pretty straightforward.
blums_books's review against another edition
challenging
dark
funny
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Complicated
3.5
graywacke's review against another edition
adventurous
reflective
medium-paced
4.0
It’s kind of like a break. An easy readable Faulkner - mostly. It’s more a boy’s story, giving it a Huck Finn quality, with a black and white bond. The race aspect has serious issues, but also warmth and intimacy within a not very warm environment. These are also nicely plotted novels, with the penultimate story capitalizing on everything before and ramping up the tension and sustaining it. This book is, perhaps, a good introduction to Faulkner.
cat4280's review against another edition
4.0
I enjoyed the storyline of this novel, but the continuous use of slurs in regards to African Americans was not one that I enjoyed having to continuously read repeatedly. I understand that within the world of this novel it was a common occurrence, but it was still unpleasant to read. Despite this, the overarching plot was enjoyable to read and interesting to read about.
joshrskinner's review against another edition
4.0
More like 3 1/2*. Hit and miss set of shorts; a couple are great, and others are far from it. Definitely worth reading--it is Faulkner!
reeshadovahsil's review against another edition
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Complicated
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
1.5
Ugh. What a miserable read. Faulkner is not for me.
To be fair, neither is the Confederate-sympathetic view of the Civil War and the owning of other people. I probably shouldn't have bothered to even try reading this stream-of-consciousness racism-choked mess.
The second half-star is for the character Drusilla before she was "beaten". I was briefly delighted that this might have secretly been a pro-trans story, but it turned out to just be another way to beat an independent woman down and brand her with "hysteria".
People have said that Faulkner's work is "difficult" and one must "be patient" in order to understand it. There was nothing difficult about the content of this book - other than the sensation of being trapped listening to a person with ADHD (such as myself) desperately try to finish telling a relatively simple story the most complex way possible which turns out to be incredibly boring and pointless in the end.
There was no enlightenment in this story. No real and honest recognition from the privileged characters that owning others was wrong, that forcing women into lives they don't want and aren't suited to is wrong, and no attempt to undo or right anything. We're meant to feel sympathy for these characters who have everything they have only because they enslaved others to do the work for them, and then lost it.
Yet while they recognize that those they think of as "less than" are smarter, or more clever, or just as strong as them, and are willing to utilize that to their benefit, they still choose to push them down as a whole, kill them rather than let them vote, force them into a loveless marriage rather than let them be themselves.
Finally, we're expected to feel a deep awe that one white guy decides not to kill another white guy for killing a white guy who has killed lots of others—and OMFG I could not care less!
There's no point in indulging the stories of those in the ruling class taking advantage of being in the ruling class, recognizing the literal equality of those "beneath" them, and then continuing to enforce themselves as the ruling class anyway.
This was an utter waste of time. The only benefit I've come out of it with is knowing not to read any more Faulkner.
To be fair, neither is the Confederate-sympathetic view of the Civil War and the owning of other people. I probably shouldn't have bothered to even try reading this stream-of-consciousness racism-choked mess.
The second half-star is for the character Drusilla before she was "beaten". I was briefly delighted that this might have secretly been a pro-trans story, but it turned out to just be another way to beat an independent woman down and brand her with "hysteria".
People have said that Faulkner's work is "difficult" and one must "be patient" in order to understand it. There was nothing difficult about the content of this book - other than the sensation of being trapped listening to a person with ADHD (such as myself) desperately try to finish telling a relatively simple story the most complex way possible which turns out to be incredibly boring and pointless in the end.
There was no enlightenment in this story. No real and honest recognition from the privileged characters that owning others was wrong, that forcing women into lives they don't want and aren't suited to is wrong, and no attempt to undo or right anything. We're meant to feel sympathy for these characters who have everything they have only because they enslaved others to do the work for them, and then lost it.
Yet while they recognize that those they think of as "less than" are smarter, or more clever, or just as strong as them, and are willing to utilize that to their benefit, they still choose to push them down as a whole, kill them rather than let them vote, force them into a loveless marriage rather than let them be themselves.
Finally, we're expected to feel a deep awe that one white guy decides not to kill another white guy for killing a white guy who has killed lots of others—and OMFG I could not care less!
There's no point in indulging the stories of those in the ruling class taking advantage of being in the ruling class, recognizing the literal equality of those "beneath" them, and then continuing to enforce themselves as the ruling class anyway.
This was an utter waste of time. The only benefit I've come out of it with is knowing not to read any more Faulkner.
Graphic: Misogyny, Racial slurs, Racism, and Sexism