Reviews tagging 'Suicidal thoughts'

Solaris by Stanisław Lem

6 reviews

f18's review against another edition

Go to review page

mysterious reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? N/A
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Loss never truly heals, we carry it with us always.

This book is conceptually-driven, which is great for sci-fi and those sections really worked for me (What does it mean to make first contact with a being so vastly different from yourself that there is no consensus on whether it is alive much less has a conciousness? How would you even know?), but it is also inextricably anchored in human emotion. Maybe the characters and relationships are kept a bit blank purposefully so that you can overlay your own experiences, but I felt distanced instead. The emotional segments didn't feel fully impactful because I didn't feel like I knew enough of the history between Kelvin and Harey
or the development between Kelvin and Solaris!Harey.
Ultimately I felt the pain, isolation, melancholy, and regret... but faintly. I wanted to feel it more.

Every character is stuck inside their own heads, haunted by their own traumas, an impermeable wall between themselves and others that keeps them from healing, echoed by their isolation inside Solaris station... and ultimately echoing my reading experience being unable to connect with Kelvin. Fuck, is it genius after all?

Also, this feels nit-picky of me, because the passages were so brief when compared to the whole book, but the way women's bodies were described made me uncomfortable (racially stereotyped and objectifying). It felt unnecessary... the descriptions weren't sensual (not like the beautiful description of peach fuzz on a cheek) nor even sexual, just lurid in an otherwise quite chaste novel. I couldn’t see what those two passages
--one describing Gibarian's memory woman's breasts and buttocks, the other describing Harey's nipple seen through her dress--
contributed and felt the book would have been the same had they been left out.

Besides that, I loved the gorgeous visuals. Lem creates an alien landscape of colour and shape where the mind inescapably finds familiarity in the strange. Before reading I found the cover art with the ocean that mimics bedsheets rather strange, but it clicks for me now.

Curious to know how exactly this translation differs from the one translated from the french version, but I didn't love it enough that I want to  read both. 

Excited to watch the movie (movies? at least the Tarkovsky) now.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ru_th's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious reflective slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.5

Denk nur, wir haben alle Sterne und Planeten benannt, aber vielleicht hatten sie schon ihre Namen?

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

angrangy's review

Go to review page

challenging inspiring mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5


Expand filter menu Content Warnings

erebus53's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional informative mysterious reflective sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

3.5

I started listening to this audiobook alongside the paperback that I was given by my brother about 20 years ago. The translation is different and it was kind of fun until I gave up because my eyes were causing me issues (the reason I predominantly listen to Audiobooks). Each  paragraph meant basically the same thing, but the wording was slightly different, which felt a bit like reading subtitles when they don't quite match how I interpret the original language. Fun.. but a bit exhausting.

Out in the vastness of space there is most likely intelligent life, and this is the story of what happens when humans encounter alien life so vast and different to our own that communicating with it, or even being noticed by it, becomes a spur for entirely new fields of science and philosophy. The premise of the plot is that instead of life developing, pluralising, and leaving the ocean, it has stayed in the ocean and become it, organising into what appears to act like one ever-seething organism. This organism extrudes matter from itself in forms that scientists have been observing for decades, trying to make sense of the ever changing landscape.

When Kris Kelvin lands on Solaris, only to be told that his once mentor has recently died, he has to figure out what is going on. When he runs into another person, who should not be there, walking in the corridor, he starts to understand the warning of his fellow who begged him not to engage with any strangers.

This story is at times spooky, horrific and maddening, and lumbers at a frustrating pace through hypotheses and tests, as the scientists try to figure out the shapes and human forms that the planet is making for them, that (in Bradbury-esque fashion) seem to be patterned on their own deepest memories. Together they try to overcome their own stress and cabin-fever, and  strive to understand the nature of, and perhaps communicate with, the life-form of the planet.

In the discussion of morality, spirituality and godforms, it doesn't escape me that they speak of humans being limited by our animal perceptions of the environment around us, so that perhaps the only type of life we can truly communicate with has to be human-like.  Is the life on Solaris trying to interact with humans by sending humanlike synthetic things, or are we again in a trap of anthropomorphising and presuming that our own mythologies are fact?.. 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

captainfez's review against another edition

Go to review page

challenging dark mysterious slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.0

Apparently this wasn’t the first time I’d read Solaris.

After I’d finished this Kindle edition – one with the Lem-approved translation, executed by Bill Johnston – I discovered an older, dog-eared copy of the work on my shelves. I must have read that version from the time in university when I had a Russian partner who was interested in getting me into Russian literature, to the extent that I wrote some essays for her. (On Goncharov, I think? I can’t quite remember.)

Anyway, being unable to remember treading those star-paths before seemed to be very in keeping with the work itself, and I assume Lem would approve.

The novel details the journey of a scientist, Kris Kelvin, as he travels to a space station orbiting the planet Solaris. His mission? To understand what the fuck’s going on up there. The other scientists he’s dropping in on have been acting strangely (to the point of
suicide
) and the plug’s about to be pulled.

Oh yeah, and the planet is home to a sentient ocean that likes to build fractal architecture and garden models in its spare time.

When I was at school, thanks to facts discovered later, Solaris was widely regarded as a planet endowed with life—but with only a single inhabitant…

It also likes to send replica versions of your most painful or dearest memory up to visit you, which is how Kelvin gets to meet his dead wife again, a sort of intergalactic RealDoll reliant on closeness to exist.


While there’s a certain element of Cold War paranoia at work – the floating in my tin can vibe of the times – the story isn’t really about space bugs or high opera. It’s about the possibility – or more appropriately, the impossibility – of communicating. Ostensibly it’s about communicating with the living ocean below the station, but really the novel looks more closely at interpersonal communications, and ultimately at the way we communicate with ourselves through memory and experience, no matter how much we distract ourselves with star-striving, exploration and achievement.

To read the rest of the review, consider visiting https://captainfez.com/2023/01/03/book-and-movie-review-solaris/ 

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

magicshop's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging mysterious reflective tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

Man has gone out to explore other worlds and other civilizations without having explored his own labyrinth of dark passages and secret chambers, and without finding what lies behind doorways that he himself has sealed. 

you should read this book if...
  • you enjoy very imaginative and complex sci fi. and i mean complex. things will go over your head at times for most people, so be ready for that too 😅
  • you're into solipsism and existential themes
  • you're prepared to deal with quite a bit of pervasive sexism and misogynoir

the good
  • ultimately a deep exploration of the human psyche and how it deals with grief, how it sabotages itself, lies to itself, and continuously hopes for the impossible against all odds. how can we be sure we exist  ― that anything exists? how can we explore the unknown without first working to understand ourselves and each other? and much more that'll definitely entertain you if you enjoy philosophy and psychology.
  • the concept/premise itself is undeniably interesting and attractive to anyone who enjoys space-related sci fi, and the book manages to deliver on it, albeit convolutedly (more on this further below).

the bad
  • cringe-worthy racism and sexism, especially the latter since it takes up a big part of the story. basically one very minor character is a huge stereotype of black women, and is perceived by the main character with clear repulsion and even disgust most of the time. another female character, who is quite important to the plot,
    not only has no real personality aside from on-and-off self-hatred and suicidal intent, but actually ends up dying three times ― twice to suicide, and mostly in order to benefit the main male character's plot.
    do keep in mind that this is a book from the 60s and a degree of these elements is almost to be expected, but i still wouldn't blame anyone for wanting to avoid it like the plague based on this stuff alone.
  • the book is entirely about the plight of a bunch of white dudes stuck together in a space station. this combined with the above... i rest my case 🙄

the complicated
  • reads like a fictional textbook at times ― the pacing is really kind of.......Bad. lem switches between plot and long (and i mean long) scientific explanations about the planet at the drop of a hat, with no rhyme or reason, and you need a lot of patience and/or enjoyment of the subject matter to get through most of it (i was mostly the latter since i'm obsessed with space and alien life, but even then a lot of things went over my head for being far too technical with way too many made-up words).
  • the ending paragraph is a banger, but the ending itself was
    very open-ended
    and kind of unsatisfying to me. i just personally needed more closure than we got, but that might be a me thing, so it doesn't go in the bad section.
  • the main relationship is between people around 10 years apart in age, which to me is not a problem in itself, except that
    the woman is a "clone" of the dude's girlfriend when she was 19, so he's basically dating someone who's mentally stuck at age 19 and has a different idea of who he is than who he actually is after growing up. that kind of irks me personally (it comes off as him taking advantage of her innocence and lack of knowledge at certain points) so i thought i'd put it here in case anyone else has trouble with that kind of thing.

Expand filter menu Content Warnings