Reviews tagging 'Murder'

Company of Liars by Karen Maitland

11 reviews

nanandan's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark emotional informative mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

I really loved this book. It blended informative historical context with an intriguing and fateful narrative. 4.5 only because things resolved in a way I didn't quite understand, and it fell a little flat compared to the brilliance of everything else.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

toorsdenote's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous mysterious
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? Yes
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.75

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

screechie's review against another edition

Go to review page

medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? It's complicated

3.75

More of an invisible companion’s pov on a relocation than an adventure tale. Investing enough that I kept picking it up & finished it, but not engrossing enough to keep me from putting it down & walking away for a few days. (Good for a few-chapters-at-a-time-read vs a binge-it-all-read). The antagonist is overly clear but the character development of everyone other than that person is well done.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

snslayer's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

This was an interesting read but an absolutely brutal one. Very bleak so read with care, especially if you’re Jewish, queer, disabled, or a woman.
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ch3llou's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

christcore's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? Yes
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Enjoyed it just about as much as I expected to. LOTS of words that were unfamiliar to me as an American English speaker. Reading it on my kindle, it was frustrating that many of the words didn’t have entries in the dictionaries available. BUT there is a glossary at the end that I discovered after reading the whole thing.

Pacing is a bit odd. The beginning is meandering w/ a lot of minor interactions documented and then the last five or so chapters area a whirlwind of major events.

Gruesome and ugly in a way that feels appropriate for the time period. 

Surprisingly little to do with the actual plague beyond it being the reason that the group must travel to outpace the pestilence,  The ending twist was frankly unnecessary and didn’t really shock me. 

CW: ableism, antisemitism, homophobic hate crime, suicide by hanging, traumatic childbirth scene, age gap sexual encounter b/t master and apprentice, some medical gore
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

miastr's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark mysterious tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? Yes
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

soupy_twist's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark informative mysterious reflective sad tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.25

Expand filter menu Content Warnings

ceallaighsbooks's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious sad tense slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

4.5

“The dancing orange flames cast huge grey shadows of us on to the wall of the cave, our every movement parodied in a grotesque form, like a mummers’ play performed for our mockery. Our shadows poured into one another, so that monsters appeared with two shaggy heads. Humpbacked dragons curled in sleep and mermaids flicked their sinuous tails. Shadows are such insubstantial things, yet they are bigger than any of us.”

TITLE—Company of Liars
AUTHOR—Karen Maitland
PUBLISHED—2008

GENRE—historical fiction/fantasy; folk horror; loose retelling
SETTING—medieval England, 1348 CE
MAIN THEMES/SUBJECTS—storytelling & magic, hope & delusion, faith & lies, medieval worldbuilding, loose Canterbury Tales retelling, medieval England, the Black Death & pandemics, found family, wolves & werewolves, misfits & outcasts, xenophobia, a mix of Norse, Celtic & Christian metaphysics & mythology

WRITING STYLE—⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
CHARACTERS—⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
STORY/PLOT—⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
BONUS ELEMENT/S—I loved the MC and the narrative voice; also each character’s story was really good (except Zophiel’s lol but he sucks)
PHILOSOPHY—⭐️⭐️⭐️/⭐️
EDITING—🤨 definitely some issues with a few things—especially continuity (i.e. characters participating in conversations after they’ve walked away from the group etc.)—that I feel like the editing team shouldddd have caught but 🤷🏻‍♀️

“Do you think words have the power to kill? Who knows where they go once they are spoken aloud; they drift off like seeds in the wind. ‘Speak no evil’, my nursemaid used to say, ‘for tiny demons lurk everywhere just waiting to catch your words and use them to tip their arrows with poison.’”

It’s been too long since I’ve read THE CANTERBURY TALES unfortunately so I can’t really talk about any connections between the classic and this loose retelling (though I intended to reread both books together later) but I will say that I thoroughly enjoyed this book.

Part historical fiction, part folk horror, it is dark and gruesome and the medieval worldbuilding is really absorbing. I also thought the characters were really original for this type of historical fiction book (no monks! lol). I also thought the plot was compelling enough to keep me interested but slow enough to let me linger in the world and get to know the characters better.

Honestly my only real “criticism” (except for the big misses by the editing team 🤨) is that the character of Zophiel got *tiring* after a while and like while I “get it” like, I was ready for his character to just not talk anymore. 🤣 (Also I feel like his backstory didn’t even get close to justifying his character traits but whatever. 😂) I was also a *bit* underwhelmed by the ending but at the same time it was still pretty perfect, so.

I would recommend this book to readers who like medieval European historical fiction—you could do a lot worse than this book. If you don’t like medieval European historical fiction, you’ll probably want to skip this one. If you like gothic & folk horror stories that are a bit slow and tense, you might want to give this one a try. 

Final thoughts: The gloomy, ghostly atmosphere was probably my favorite thing about this book after the MC’s narrative voice and the characters’ individual tales. I’d read this again. In fact I *will* read this again after I reread THE CANTERBURY TALES. This is also the kind of book where it seems like it would be fun to read again, knowing how it ends, and seeing all the clues everywhere…

“It was hard to adjust to, but the old laws and the old order were crumbling about our ears. There was a new king and his name was pestilence. And he had created a new law—thou shalt do anything to survive.”

⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️.5

TW // I mean it’s medieval England so there’s LOTS: some include graphic ableism, child abuse, animal cruelty & death, rape, misogyny, antisemitism, hanging, suicide, xenophobia, religious bigotry, incest (Please feel free to DM me for more specifics!)

Further Reading—
  • The Story of Silence, by Alex Myers
  • The Pillars of the Earth, by Ken Follett
  • The Tale of the Tailor and the Three Dead Kings, by Dan Jones
  • Lapvona, by Ottessa Moshfegh—TBR
  • Wolf Hall, by Hilary Mantel 
  • Bernard Cornwell
  • Sharon Kay Penman
Expand filter menu Content Warnings

astronut's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous challenging dark tense medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Character
  • Strong character development? It's complicated
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes

5.0

Expand filter menu Content Warnings