Scan barcode
jaredjoseph's review against another edition
5.0
But what an unfathomable grief that no amount of time can chase away, no amount of time can cure - to know that it would be of no help if existence did everything!
coysests's review against another edition
3.0
"If there were no eternal consciousness in a man, if at the bottom of everything there were only a wild ferment, a power that twisting in dark passions produced everything great or inconsequential; if an unfathomable, insatiable emptiness lay hid beneath everything, what would life be but despair?"
Доста плътна (може би в лошия смисъл) за обема си.
Доста плътна (може би в лошия смисъл) за обема си.
theologiaviatorum's review against another edition
challenging
reflective
slow-paced
3.5
Virgil's Root Beer helped me get through this. I have almost nothing to say about Fear and Trembling except to say that I have almost nothing to say. He is the most opaque writer I've ever encountered. But I must try to say SOMETHING. I gathered at least that he was trying to explicate something of the nature of faith, and he used Abraham, the "Father of Faith," to do it, specifically his sacrifice of Isaac. It seemed to me as if Kierkegaard was reacting against the Modernist tendency to subsume everything under rationality. The problems, it seems, are twofold. 1. If all that is contained in the Bible can be discovered by reason alone, apart from revelation, then why do we have revelation at all? Reason will have rendered revelation unnecessary. 2. To think that rationality can call Abraham's sacrifice of Isaac a virtue is to tame the story. Kierkegaard seems to say that Abraham's sacrifice is not justifiable by any merely rational or ethical means. If we were to examine him, apart from faith, by purely rational means, the best we could say of him is that he is a murderer. But revelation does not label him so. Instead he is the paragon of faith. So, faith cannot be understood from the outside, that is, if Abraham is to be our picture of faith. Again, this makes revelation necessary. The movements of faith are only possible as a response to God, and they cannot be understood apart from that response. God creates a people who do not make sense. Yet, they DO exist. His saints are living paradoxes.
It is this break with Modernism that earns Kierkegaard a place in the Post-Modern movement (though some debate this). Again, I slogged through this work most often not knowing what I was reading. But, perhaps that is because he was attempting to discuss that which goes beyond the bounds of understanding. Let the reader decide. I cannot say I am a fan of Kierkegaard, but he has undoubtedly wrought an influence on thinkers such as Karl Barth, Wittgenstein, Stanley Hauerwas, and others. As such, he is a part of our intellectual heritage. He who desires to grapple with Kierkegaard must be brave. Or have lots of Root Beer. But mostly be brave
It is this break with Modernism that earns Kierkegaard a place in the Post-Modern movement (though some debate this). Again, I slogged through this work most often not knowing what I was reading. But, perhaps that is because he was attempting to discuss that which goes beyond the bounds of understanding. Let the reader decide. I cannot say I am a fan of Kierkegaard, but he has undoubtedly wrought an influence on thinkers such as Karl Barth, Wittgenstein, Stanley Hauerwas, and others. As such, he is a part of our intellectual heritage. He who desires to grapple with Kierkegaard must be brave. Or have lots of Root Beer. But mostly be brave
cameronius's review against another edition
3.0
Fear and Trembling is the work that gave rise to the notion of a Kierkegaardian "leap of faith," one of my favorite philosophical concepts. I read portions of this book as an undergrad, but finally sat down to read it in full. For Kierkegaard, religious faith transcends the Hegelian premise of the ethical as universal and can only be understood by virtue of a leap into the absurd. He illustrates this to great poetic effect with various interpretations of the Biblical tale of Abraham and Isaac. Kierkegaard is always entertaining and this slim book is no exception. However, this is one of the least coherent works in his famously weird oeuvre and easily the least fun to read. YMMV, but a summary of this book might be better than slogging through it.
bookfreak1982's review against another edition
5.0
A wonderful approach to Abraham's decision to sacrifice his son with further thoughts on ethics and belief.
Long live existentialism!
Long live existentialism!