Scan barcode
misssleepy's review against another edition
adventurous
funny
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Plot
- Strong character development? No
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? No
4.75
I loved this book way more than I expected. It was very adventurous and funny!! I laughed at loud at several parts.
The chapters with the duke and the king were very frustrating. I was very happy to rid of them lol.
I loved Jim and thought he was very endearing. I thought his relationship with Huck was so fascinating to read 200-something years later. I thought Twain did a great job of using Huck’s inner thoughts to help the reader understand that complexities of the relationships between black and white people during that time. As a reader today it made me sad but it was also enlightening in a way too.
Omg Tom Sawyer!!! He was really just the most annoying but also I thought he was funny? Just too over the top lol.
James by Percival Everett is up next and I am so excited to stay in the world of huck finn and Jim.
The chapters with the duke and the king were very frustrating. I was very happy to rid of them lol.
I loved Jim and thought he was very endearing. I thought his relationship with Huck was so fascinating to read 200-something years later. I thought Twain did a great job of using Huck’s inner thoughts to help the reader understand that complexities of the relationships between black and white people during that time. As a reader today it made me sad but it was also enlightening in a way too.
Omg Tom Sawyer!!! He was really just the most annoying but also I thought he was funny? Just too over the top lol.
James by Percival Everett is up next and I am so excited to stay in the world of huck finn and Jim.
jdarnold's review against another edition
5.0
A really good read, much better than *Tom Sawyer*. It was funnier and more heartfelt than Tom, with a character who thought he wasn't any good but really was a great kid, despite his challenges. Catching up late on these two classics, but this one had way more memorable characters and told a more interesting story.
It's biggest drawback was that it was a "quest" story. I am not a big fan of quest stories. These are usually the domain of fantasy or science fiction, so the author can throw all kinds of disconnected but "interesting" vignettes at you. They never seem to hang together all that well for me, and don't tell a cohesive story. It is kind of like a dream sequence, where there are no repercussions or any need for connections as the story goes along.
So I often find it hard to pay attention. This one managed to avoid that for a while, as Huck Finn and Jim, thrown together by accident, float down the mighty Mississippi. Perhaps because Twain didn't feel like he was in a rush to tell stories, the story felt as languid and deep as the river itself.
There were a couple interesting incidents. I particularly liked the one where Huck Finn, for reasons that escape me, dressed up as a girl and ended up in a long conversation with a woman in her home. He was trying his best to keep up the facade, but you could tell she saw right through him. I really liked the bit where she threw something heavy at him and he caught it in his dress. Later, she explained that she knew he was a boy because he caught it by bringing his knees together, where a girl would have spread her legs to catch it in the dress itself. Small insights like these are what really kept Huck Finn interesting for me.
But eventually the traveling down the river just took too long. While the King and the Duke were interesting for a bit, for a pair of frauds, that went on for a little too long. And how he ended up running back into Tom Sawyer required a real suspension of disbelief. And the whole time Tom Sawyer was around, while there were some pretty funny incidents, especially as they made Jim act out Tom's ideas of a book perfect escape, also went along too long and stretched credulity to the far limits.
Much like *Tom Sawyer*, the casual vicious racism of the period depicted is both jarring and depressing. Written in 1884, and set in the 1840s, it really is nightmarish just how sub-human the whites of the time felt the African Americans were. This book emphasizes in a few places just how the white folks, even the poorest of them, held the slaves and ex-slaves as barely above, or probably equal to, dogs in the social scale. The way the N word is tossed around is just so hard to take. I think Mark Twain realized it too, because he probably humanized Jim more than most authors would have at the time, but it still burns a hole in your soul just reading about it.
So in the end, probably more of a 4.5 book. But I laughed enough and enjoyed the growth of Huck Finn enough, that it is easy to round it up to a 5 star book. I am not sure but you probably ought to make sure you read *Tom Sawyer* first. This is, in my opinion, a far superior book, but I think you'll understand the characters and setting more if you read Tom first. But, in any case, highly recommended. And the audiobook, read by Grover Gardner, is really well done. The vernacular is pretty heavy in this book and he does a fantastic job with all of them.
It's biggest drawback was that it was a "quest" story. I am not a big fan of quest stories. These are usually the domain of fantasy or science fiction, so the author can throw all kinds of disconnected but "interesting" vignettes at you. They never seem to hang together all that well for me, and don't tell a cohesive story. It is kind of like a dream sequence, where there are no repercussions or any need for connections as the story goes along.
So I often find it hard to pay attention. This one managed to avoid that for a while, as Huck Finn and Jim, thrown together by accident, float down the mighty Mississippi. Perhaps because Twain didn't feel like he was in a rush to tell stories, the story felt as languid and deep as the river itself.
There were a couple interesting incidents. I particularly liked the one where Huck Finn, for reasons that escape me, dressed up as a girl and ended up in a long conversation with a woman in her home. He was trying his best to keep up the facade, but you could tell she saw right through him. I really liked the bit where she threw something heavy at him and he caught it in his dress. Later, she explained that she knew he was a boy because he caught it by bringing his knees together, where a girl would have spread her legs to catch it in the dress itself. Small insights like these are what really kept Huck Finn interesting for me.
But eventually the traveling down the river just took too long. While the King and the Duke were interesting for a bit, for a pair of frauds, that went on for a little too long. And how he ended up running back into Tom Sawyer required a real suspension of disbelief. And the whole time Tom Sawyer was around, while there were some pretty funny incidents, especially as they made Jim act out Tom's ideas of a book perfect escape, also went along too long and stretched credulity to the far limits.
Much like *Tom Sawyer*, the casual vicious racism of the period depicted is both jarring and depressing. Written in 1884, and set in the 1840s, it really is nightmarish just how sub-human the whites of the time felt the African Americans were. This book emphasizes in a few places just how the white folks, even the poorest of them, held the slaves and ex-slaves as barely above, or probably equal to, dogs in the social scale. The way the N word is tossed around is just so hard to take. I think Mark Twain realized it too, because he probably humanized Jim more than most authors would have at the time, but it still burns a hole in your soul just reading about it.
So in the end, probably more of a 4.5 book. But I laughed enough and enjoyed the growth of Huck Finn enough, that it is easy to round it up to a 5 star book. I am not sure but you probably ought to make sure you read *Tom Sawyer* first. This is, in my opinion, a far superior book, but I think you'll understand the characters and setting more if you read Tom first. But, in any case, highly recommended. And the audiobook, read by Grover Gardner, is really well done. The vernacular is pretty heavy in this book and he does a fantastic job with all of them.
trxcymbr's review against another edition
adventurous
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? It's complicated
- Loveable characters? Yes
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.25
bibliogirl0511's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
informative
reflective
sad
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.0
ericaereads's review against another edition
slow-paced
2.5
2.5 stars rounded down for the virulent racism and glossy slavery. I do not understand how this book is considered to have abolitionist undertones when that is, like, demonstrably not the case.
Huck's musings on religion, the subtle class commentary, and the "Americana" feels gave it the half star. And, I admit, I did find Huck a compelling character (I spent most of the novel reading him as a trickster character until the last quarter when...Tom came onto the scene (and ruined any chance of me seeing this as an abolitionist text)). And Twain's prose is....Twain's prose. Not my favorite, but I understand why it makes all the elitist literature folks go, "Look! Look at this craft!"
Is this a meaningful "classical" text in 2024? I'm honestly not sure. And I even have the fancy degree and letters behind my name that say I know how to read books. Ultimately I ended this book frustrated, angry, and also going, "How the heck and why the heck was I assigned to read this back in high-school? Literally WTF?"
Huck's musings on religion, the subtle class commentary, and the "Americana" feels gave it the half star. And, I admit, I did find Huck a compelling character (I spent most of the novel reading him as a trickster character until the last quarter when...Tom came onto the scene (and ruined any chance of me seeing this as an abolitionist text)). And Twain's prose is....Twain's prose. Not my favorite, but I understand why it makes all the elitist literature folks go, "Look! Look at this craft!"
Is this a meaningful "classical" text in 2024? I'm honestly not sure. And I even have the fancy degree and letters behind my name that say I know how to read books. Ultimately I ended this book frustrated, angry, and also going, "How the heck and why the heck was I assigned to read this back in high-school? Literally WTF?"
Graphic: Racial slurs, Racism, and Slavery