I actually preferred this book to the first even though I was slightly disappointed that the author decided to make Merlin a Christian as apposed to making him a Pagan, but other than that a really good read.

My favorite of the 3 I read in this series. Really good origin story.

"Unreasonable men are ever unreasonable, and only become more so when threatened. Truth always threatens the false-hearted."

The story of Myrddin ap Taliesin told with a strength that it always deserves but rarely is granted.

The second book in Stephen Lawhead's Pendragon Cycle, Merlin continues the story where Taliesin left off. However, this book could be read as a stand alone and as such, it is not necessary to read Taliesin (the story of Merlin's parents) before reading this book.

We are shown Merlin as a young child, his teaching from the kindly druid Hafgan and the priest Dafyd, then to his capture by a small tribe and his years in imprisonment, to his adult life. His adult life is where most of the actions take place and because he is long lived, he experiences the life of many men. He is a King at a point, a husband, a hermit, and then we see him in his most well known role, adviser to the High King's of Britain and his plotting that puts them on the throne. While not much is yet said of Arthur, he is born in this book. But there is more than that, this book explores Merlin as a man and his feelings and emotions. Instead of being a wise implacable sage, there is much more to him in this book.

Most of the characters were well done in this book. While some only had minor roles, they were pertinent to the story and really added to Merlin's life. Merlin himself expressed a wide range of emotions and was made to feel more human than he is in other Arthurian novels. My only complaint as far as characterization goes was that for the majority, Christians equaled good and wholesome while everyone else was described as evil or ignorant. It was a bit offensive.

Lawhead is a very descriptive writer and it shows in this series. He brings Merlin to life in a semi-realistic way (there is still some magic although he doesn't call it that due to his Christian flavor of the book). He tells a compelling story and doesn't shrink on any of the details. That being said, this book does get slow in some parts as he tells the story in one pace regardless if that scene is interesting or not. Also, the book tends to get preachy in parts with him waxing eloquently on the pleasures of Christianity. I'm fine with an author inserting his religion in a book, but they should still follow the rule "show, don't tell."

A major flaw with the book that I personally thought was strange was his use of magic despite making his characters entirely Christian. It seemed odd to me that they were doing things, that in that time, should have gotten them burned at the stake for being a witch instead of being lauded as most holy. It just didn't seem logical to me. He also has the Fair Folk (Merlin's family) living a lot longer than everybody else and while I know the bible has this happen to, it seems strange that this wouldn't have made the normal people angry and fearful of the Fair Folk instead of liking them.

I'll probably continue with the series and hope that they be less preachy. There are some great points in the novel and overall it is an interesting story. Plus, I hate starting something I can't finish and there are a few more books to go.

Merlin
Copyright 1988
445 pages

Review by M. Reynard 2010

Don’t take gravity too lightly, or it’ll catch up with you.

The Pendragon Trilogy, by Stephen R. Lawhead, which includes Taliesin, Merlin, and Arthur. I read old paperbacks from Avon Books which I received as hand-me-downs from my aunt. The original publication dates were 1987, 1988, and 1989.

Turns out I was confused about these books. I had figured out the order of the trilogy as Taliesin, Merlin, and Arthur, but here and there I would see other titles in the series. So, once I had finished the trilogy, I researched and discovered that the “trilogy” was expanded, a few years after publication, into a “cycle,” with the addition of two more books: Pendragon and Grail. The problem? Because Lawhead released these after realizing the giant hole he left in the plot in the quick wrap-up of Arthur, he ended up writing into the hole. In other words, the books suddenly stop being (or working) chronologically. Called “more like an appendix” and “better than Arthur,” the latter books are now read by many in a makeshift order, which I wish I had done.

Sorta. Because even though I would have appreciated the whole thing in the chronological-event order without the gaping hole, I didn’t enjoy the first three books enough to want to continue to two more. I’m still torn on whether or not I should or want to continue the series.

In the words of Jessi from GoodReads, “If I were to go back in time, I would read the first book in Pendragon, then the first two books of Arthur, then go back and finish Pendragon, then finish Arthur. That’s how it actually goes sequentially.” Although, with Grail thrown in there, you would have to insert it before Arthur‘s third and final “book.” For a list of the chronological progression, see the Wikipedia article HERE. But how obnoxious do we want to get? How much does all this jumping around and amending take away from the quality of the series? I mean, reading it without knowing these tricks, I just got to the end and–through tiny little tears–thought, What?!? We worked our way (the entire time) up to the Kingdom of Summer and then it was SKIPPED?!?

But to be honest, it wasn’t as surprising as it should of been, because the whole trilogy has major issues with plot development. We’ll get to that in a minute.

First, let’s talk about another super-handy list at Wikipedia that–had I known then what I know now–I would have printed out to have hand while reading. This list is the modern character and place name equivalents of the ones that Lawhead uses. In his defense, the whole series is moved back several centuries (to fifth century Britain from medieval times) to line it up more closely with the demise of Atlantis and the Roman empire. From there, the books are highly history-inspired, which means that the names have been made more appropriate to the time period. However, I really fault Lawhead for not giving us a simple list by which to decipher the characters and places we have grown accustomed to, like the (obvious) Guinevere as Gwenhwyvar, or–the much less obvious–Excalibur as Caledvwlch.

Not to mention, it would have been helpful to know why I was beginning an Arthurian trilogy on Atlantis, with nary a character to recognize (or so I thought).

Basically, I love reading Arthurian legends, but–despite its fan-base and high recommendations–I have a lot to complain about this series. Some more:

The narrator changes. This wouldn’t be so bad if it happened on a consistent basis, but it doesn’t. And there were times I was wondering who on earth was talking to me, and why. Not only that, but the voice barely changes (or not at all) between the narrators. Only the perspective does.
The book was rampant with negative phrases like “no less than.” It drove me batty.
There were a lot of battles. Detailed. Especially in Arthur. Some people live for that type of fantasy writing. I do not.
The series just plain lacked excitement. The best bits were really the middle of Taliesin and the end of Arthur. In between, I was usually bored.
Lawhead has a really strange way of in-your-face foreshadowing. In and of itself, it’s a bit laughable. But when you pair it with lack of delivery, it’s downright infuriating. Like, he might say, “Their fears for the morning would prove to be true.” Then, in the morning, maybe it would drizzle and then they would win the battle. WHAT?!? This happened over and over and over. I would get all psyched up for some fore-told event, and the event itself would fizzle in a lake of mediocrity and ordinariness.
Specifically, Morgian’s (Morgan le Fay) evilness is talked up frequently and Merlin is always showing physical anxiety about her. But when she does show up–so rarely–she’s almost all talk and she accomplishes very little. The two truly vile things she actually does manage are off-screen and vague. The same is true for Guinevere (in the negative), but I am assured that she comes more into her own in the later books.

All in all, I felt very unfulfilled with character and plot development. I felt like there were a whole mess of words which took me nowhere. And the development that did happen came in fits and starts that trailed off into oblivion. (It’s hard to accurately describe this feeling. Because I know, literally, the plot did continue on. But it was like running in a dream. Or like you were reading an author’s plot notes. Or running on a treadmill. There was no zing. No exceitement.) Plus, it seems to me that Lawhead omitted many of the messier sides of his primary characters in favor of a glossier Christianity (and I say this as a Christian.) This is boring and inauthentic. Where is the affair? Where is the illegitimate son? It’s part of the legends, and it’s part of what would make these characters both relatable and–in the long run–heroes.

Lawhead is quite an author for telling, anyways. He’s more likely–at least in these books–to tell you that something is “majestic” than to help you feel its majesty.

In conclusion, if you like Arthurian legends or classic fantasy and are willing to persevere when things are less than perfect, then you should take a crack at this series. I would recommend having a list of the modern names, nearby, and also read the books in the order recommended above. Keep a keen eye on passing time (while understanding that some of the characters live much longer than mere humans), place, tribes/people groups, and people. With the cursory knowledge that you now have, of the series, I’m pretty sure you’ll have a much better experience than I did.

Oh, and Atlanteans = Elves.

(Please note that Lawhead would argue me on this last point, as well as give a much clearer explanation on why the books ended up in the state they did. See his comments at The Starving Artist review.)

_______________

QUOTES:

TALIESIN:

“‘Yes, and good fortune will require more of you than failure ever did'” (p155).

“‘That is where you are wrong, woman. There is never enough time for love-making. We must take it when we can'” (p330).

“‘That matters but little,’ Cuall reminded him. ‘They are here, and that is the meal that is on our plate'” (p336).

MERLIN:

“Yet, every man has two names: the one he is given, and the one he wins for himself” (p15).

“And as there is much evil in the world, there is much doubt also” (p15).

“Humility, if it comes at all, most always comes too late” (p21).

“…the twin fields of bed and battle” (p27).

“A city is an unnatural place” (p30).

“But as I said, men’s hearts remember long after their minds have forgotten” (p38).

“You must understand, Myrddin Bach, not every man will follow the Light” (p45).

“They did not trust writing, and in this showed remarkable wisdom” (p61).

“I believe that certain powerful events leave behind their own lingering traces which also color the land in subtle ways” (p135).

“…the seasons fly? Up they swirl, winging back to the Great Hand which gave them. They fly like the wild geese, but nevermore return” (p193).

“Be thankful you are knit with such strong stuff” (p324).

“To decide for one is to decide against another. I never imagined it would be this hard” (p328).

“This is our work in creation: to decide. And what we decide is woven into the thread of time and being forever” (p328).

“But remember the church is only men, and men can become jealous of another’s favor. Do not hate them for it” (p329).

“…even though I know the Light is ever found in the lost unlikely places” (p333).

“Hearing with understanding is perhaps the greater part of wisdom” (p347).

“Once spoken, a word can not be called back; once loosed, an arrow cannot return to the bow. What happens, for good or ill, happens forever, and that is the way of it” (p364).

“As I have said, the illuminating spirit, like the wind, goes where it will, and sheds a light that all-too-often obscures as much as it reveals” (p381).

“…you are not the first man to love a woman. Stop acting like a wounded bear and let us discover what can be done” (p385).

“It happens like this sometimes–and all the plans, all the reasons, all desires and possibilities fade to nothing. And all that remains is the single unwilled act” (p392).

“Of course, there is no certainty in following, either. That is what makes it faith” (p393).

“Unreasonable men are even unreasonable, and only become more so when threatened. Truth always threatens the false-hearted” (p393).

“…forgive yourself as you have been forgiven. Your failings are not unique to you alone” (p421).

“That she loved where she should rightly despise was her glory” (p439).

ARTHUR:

“If you feel maligned and impugned in his presence,’ he said, ‘no doubt it is the truth working in you'” (p35).

“It was, they discovered, the foundation stone of the worlds-realm, so they decided to lift it up and see what lay beneath it. This they did. And do you know what they found?’/’I cannot say. What did they find?’/’Love,’ replied Myrddin simply” (p148).

“…as if good men and brave did not sleep in turf houses in ground hallowed by their own blood… as if war were a word” (p197).

“Great Light! The enemy’s power is so fragile! The devils can use only what we ourselves give them” (p220).

“‘Then be worthy, boy. No one stands between you and your honor!'” (p330).

“That which is given to us to do, we will do,’ he said and turned his face away. ‘We are men and not angles after all'” (p404).

***REVIEW WRITTEN FOR THE STARVING ARTIST BLOG***

There was so much potential for this book to be great, but it only succeeded in being good. It opens with his getting ready to take and hide the infant Arthur before taking a step back and detailing Merlin's own history. Because of this it seemed to act as a bridge between the first book in the series (Taliesin) and the next book (Arthur). I understand the plot device, by starting in medias res, you pull the reader in promptly. However, in this case it strips something from the book by making me want to find out what happens with Arthur.

Unlike the first book, this one is told in the first person. Merlin himself tells you about his time with the Hill Folk, where he learned old world magics. Then he tells of his rise to be High King of Britain. Then there's his time as the Forest Lord...or hermit. Finally, there is his time as a Prophet, where he brings together old world beliefs learned from The Druids and The aforementioned Hill Folk, with new-found Christianity.

There are some really great parts to the book, however, the shift to the Forest Lord part of the book creates a schism in the story. It's filled with delusions and mad ravings. I don't begrudge him that since the loss he went through is truly tragic, but it kills the rhythm of the story. Even when he gets through to the other side and his days as a Prophet begin, the story seemed to have lost steam. While the part he plays in Aurelius and Uther's rise to prominence is interesting, it comes across as filler. Especially since Uther is Arthur's father.

All in all, it was somewhat of a letdown but if you're invested in the series, then you've got no choice to read it. Ach, that sounded worse than I wanted it to. Don't get me wrong, the book isn't bad, but coming on the heels of Taliesin and being so closely associated with Arthur himself, I expected more. So read it, but don't expect a cover-to-cover good time.