Reviews

The Last Man by Mary Shelley

lecybeth's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

When I think about apocalyptic dystopian novels, I always think of the works of modern authors. If I had to choose a 19th-century writer to create such a tale, what better than the woman who wrote Frankenstein? Although I wasn't entirely sure what was going on and why, the story did manage to hold my attention.

gzofian's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

A strange book - characters change, reversals of motive abound, as SciFi it sweeps its apocalyptic narrative along with an archaic broom. Despite a sweetie bowl brim full of sentiment, it doesn't touch with the poignancy of Frankenstein, or leave lasting questions apart from "what was she on", (beyond personal grief and political frustration).... it's a weird one.

tartie's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Debería estar estudiando pero quiero escribir una entrada sobre Mary Shelley (¡compartimos cumpleaños!) y he terminado en la madriguera de conejo del Último Hombre. Eso ya dice algo bueno del libro.

Por lo demás en deeeeeeensooo. Por lo menos para mí. Tanto que no sé que hago casi a las tres de la mañana con esto cuando me urge tanto prepararme para septiembre. Me repito pero es que mis sentimientos por este libro son duales.

Me ha gustado y es muy interesante, incluso fascinante. Pero me he aburrido.

Sea como sea lo recomiendo si tenéis tiempo (ja) y Shelley marcó el camino en tantas cosas...

Más información en: https://gorgonas.com/2020/08/28/resena-el-ultimo-hombre-mary-wollstonecraft-shelley/

swashb's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? No
  • Diverse cast of characters? No
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

1.0

Way too long and incredibly boring. 

cyborgforty's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

Technology aside, Mary Shelley got a lot of things right. That plague would befall the twenty-first century and the climate will show us her wrath, yet in the midst of it all we will still be clinging to our domesticity, we will still insist on conquest and war, we will indulge in science yet fail to apply it for the betterment of society, we will splinter into factions of religion, we will still be putting on productions of Shakespeare as the world comes to an end.

But the progression of technology was slower in Shelley's era and she could never have seen the electronic world that we inhabit today: this book is an idealistic, best-case-scenario vision of humanity that---sure, yes, fragments here or there, but for the most part---clings to community and society to endure plague, that still has appreciation for the beauty of nature and non-human beings. In some ways her world is more radical than ours---can we really do away with the English monarchy by the end of this century? For a world ravaged by plague of Eastern origin (hmmmm....), there is little xenophobia between the (mostly European) countries that Lionel & co. traverse; the English welcome immigrants (refugees!) fleeing the plague from all parts of Europe, and while the narrator does lament the fall of India, China, and the East to plague, I suspect they may not have been so hospitable to refugees from these regions.

The first half of this book was painfully slow. Mary Shelley loves to write in chronological order, and in the case of Frankenstein and Mathilda who did not live past their twenties, she doesn't have to do too much explaining in the first few chapters, but the bulk of this story happens after Lionel has married and started a family so... yeah. Something something about the influence of nostalgia in Mary Shelley's narrators, who write from their deathbeds or from the solitary desk of The Last Man On Earth. Chapter I of Volume II is really where it became a page-turner for me.

Last note: Mary Shelley's depictions of nature and astronomical phenomena are gorgeous gorgeous gorgeous.

jflux's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

Holy fucking fuck, I can't believe I finally read this whole fucking book.

charisbe's review against another edition

Go to review page

dark sad medium-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? Plot

2.75

emilygraceleff's review against another edition

Go to review page

3.0

The writing of Mary Shelley is phenomenal but this was the most depressing book I think I’ve ever read. Had actual anxiety reading some of it.

jeffwho's review against another edition

Go to review page

4.0

It took two months of lockdown to get through, but in the end enjoyed the descriptions of how a plague decimated the race and how people reacted. On to Defoe.

essie101's review against another edition

Go to review page

adventurous dark emotional mysterious reflective sad slow-paced
  • Plot- or character-driven? A mix
  • Strong character development? No
  • Loveable characters? It's complicated
  • Diverse cast of characters? It's complicated
  • Flaws of characters a main focus? No

3.75


Expand filter menu Content Warnings